Volume 48, Issue 4 pp. 241-249
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Pharmacokinetics of Ampicillin-Sulbactam in Azotemic and Non-Azotemic Dogs

Zhe Wang

Zhe Wang

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Shropshire

Sarah Shropshire

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel Gustafson

Daniel Gustafson

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Samantha Fedotova

Samantha Fedotova

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Amanda Diaz

Amanda Diaz

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nida Chornarm

Nida Chornarm

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joshua B. Daniels

Joshua B. Daniels

Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Pathology, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica Quimby

Jessica Quimby

Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kristin M. Zersen

Corresponding Author

Kristin M. Zersen

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA

Correspondence:

Kristin M. Zersen ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 March 2025
Citations: 2

Funding: This work was supported by College Research Council Grant.

ABSTRACT

Previous research has shown that azotemic dogs have a lower clearance and higher drug plasma concentrations of ampicillin compared to healthy dogs. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of ampicillin-sulbactam after multiple intravenous doses in hospitalized azotemic and non-azotemic dogs. This prospective study included 29 client-owned dogs; 19 azotemic and 10 non-azotemic. Ampicillin-sulbactam was administered at a combined dose of 22 mg/kg intravenously every 8 h for up to 5 days. Blood samples were obtained at baseline (prior to administration of the first dose of ampicillin-sulbactam), and 1-, 4-, and 8-h post-ampicillin-sulbactam administration each day. Plasma ampicillin was measured using LC-MS and non-compartmental pharmacokinetic modeling and dose interval modeling were performed. Plasma ampicillin exposure (azotemic mean 214.5 ug/mL × h ± 110.8, non-azotemic mean 60.3 ± 35.7; p < 0.0009) and half-life (azotemic mean 3.9 h ± 2.4, non-azotemic mean 1.5 h ± 0.3; p < 0.00001) were statistically greater in azotemic dogs compared to non-azotemic dogs. Single dose interval modeling predicted that 100% of azotemic dogs would have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 2) with q12 h dosing and 79% of azotemic dogs would have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 8) with q12 h dosing. Comparatively, 20% of non-azotemic dogs were predicted to have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 2) with q12 h dosing and 0 non-azotemic dogs would have > 50% of the dosing interval with plasma concentrations > MIC (MIC = 8) with q12 h dosing. This study demonstrated that q12-h dosing of ampicillin-sulbactam in azotemic dogs over multiple days of administration is sufficient to reach the PK-PD target (> 50% of dosing interval > MIC) against susceptible bacteria.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.