Volume 61, Issue 1 pp. 100-118
Invited Response

Born-Again Versus Evangelical: Does the Difference Make a Difference?

Corwin E. Smidt

Corresponding Author

Corwin E. Smidt

The Paul B. Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity and Politics, Calvin University

Correspondence should be addressed to Corwin E. Smidt, The Paul B. Henry Institute for the Study of Christianity and Politics, Calvin University, 3201 Burton St. SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546. E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 November 2021
Citations: 3

Abstract

Although it has long been recognized that treating “born-again” and “evangelical” as equivalents is problematic, little scholarly effort has been made to assess whether the difference makes a difference. This study seeks to do so, assessing, in part, the extent to which the “born-again or evangelical Christian” survey question captures evangelical identities and whether the question has merit for capturing evangelical respondents. By analyzing surveys in which respondents were asked separate questions related to a “born-again” and an evangelical identity, this study addresses several issues related to such identities, including whether “born-again” and evangelical identities are the same, and, if not, whether the difference makes a difference. In the end, significant political differences emerge between those who identify as evangelicals and those who identify as “born-again,” suggesting that scholars and surveys would be better served to ask separate “born-again” and evangelical identity questions than to merge the two into one.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.