Volume 11, Issue 1 pp. 84-92
ORIGINAL RESEARCH–OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT

Beliefs about Penis Size: Validation of a Scale for Men Ashamed about Their Penis Size

David Veale MD, FRCPscyh

Corresponding Author

David Veale MD, FRCPscyh

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Corresponding Author: David Veale, MD, Centre for Anxiety Disorders, The Maudsley Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 8AZ, UK. Tel: 0203 228 2102; Fax: 0203 228 5215; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Ertimiss Eshkevari PhD

Ertimiss Eshkevari PhD

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Julie Read MA

Julie Read MA

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah Miles MSc

Sarah Miles MSc

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Andrea Troglia

Andrea Troglia

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Rachael Phillips MSc

Rachael Phillips MSc

South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and The Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Lina Maria Carmona Echeverria

Lina Maria Carmona Echeverria

King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Chiara Fiorito

Chiara Fiorito

King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Kevan Wylie FRCP, FRCPsych, FECSM

Kevan Wylie FRCP, FRCPsych, FECSM

Porterbrook Clinic, Sheffield, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Gordon Muir FRCS

Gordon Muir FRCS

King's College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 September 2013
Citations: 8

Abstract

Introduction

No measures are available for understanding beliefs in men who experience shame about the perceived size of their penis. Such a measure might be helpful for treatment planning, and measuring outcome after any psychological or physical intervention.

Aim

Our aim was to validate a newly developed measure called the Beliefs about Penis Size Scale (BAPS).

Method

One hundred seventy-three male participants completed a new questionnaire consisting of 18 items to be validated and developed into the BAPS, as well as various other standardized measures. A urologist also measured actual penis size.

Main Outcome Measures

The BAPS was validated against six psychosexual self-report questionnaires as well as penile size measurements.

Results

Exploratory factor analysis reduced the number of items in the BAPS from 18 to 10, which was best explained by one factor. The 10-item BAPS had good internal consistency and correlated significantly with measures of depression, anxiety, body image quality of life, social anxiety, erectile function, overall satisfaction, and the importance attached to penis size. The BAPS was not found to correlate with actual penis size. It was able to discriminate between those who had concerns or were dissatisfied about their penis size and those who were not.

Conclusions

This is the first study to develop a scale for measurement of beliefs about penis size. It may be used as part of an assessment for men who experience shame about the perceived size of their penis and as an outcome measure after treatment. The BAPS measures various manifestations of masculinity and shame about their perceived penis size including internal self-evaluative beliefs; negative evaluation by others; anticipated consequences of a perceived small penis, and extreme self-consciousness. Veale D, Eshkevari E, Read J, Miles S, Troglia A, Phillips R, Carmona L, Fiorito C, Wylie K, and Muir G. Beliefs about penis size: Validation of a scale for men ashamed about their penis size. J Sex Med 2014;11:84–92.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.