Volume 37, Issue 1 pp. 124-132
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Deaths From COVID-19 in Rural, Micropolitan, and Metropolitan Areas: A County-Level Comparison

Saleema A. Karim PhD

Corresponding Author

Saleema A. Karim PhD

Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas

For further information, contact: Saleema Karim, PhD, Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, 4301 W. Markham, #820, Little Rock, AR 72205; e-mail: [email protected].

Search for more papers by this author
Hsueh-Fen Chen PhD

Hsueh-Fen Chen PhD

Department of Health Policy and Management, Fay W. Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 November 2020
Citations: 45

Abstract

Purpose

The United States has experienced a surge of COVID-19 cases and deaths. Regardless of the overall increase in the prevalence and mortality, there are disagreements about the consequences of exposure and contracting COVID-19, specifically in rural areas. Rural areas have inherent characteristics that increase their vulnerability to contracting COVID-19. The objective of this study was to investigate the differences in death rates from COVID-19 between urban and rural areas in the United States.

Methods

This study used county-level data. The data set consisted of confirmed COVID-19 cases and deaths along with county-level demographics. The sample consisted of all counties in the 50 US states and DC. Counties were designated as metropolitan, micropolitan, and rural. A zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to estimate county-level number of deaths conditional on contracting COVID-19. The study focused on COVID-19-related mortality from February 10, 2020, to June 12, 2020.

Findings

After controlling for county-level characteristics, the rate of COVID-19 deaths was 70.3% (P < .001) for rural counties and 53.4% (P < .001) for micropolitan counties, both significantly lower than metropolitan counties during the study time period.

Conclusion

Over time, rural geography and social isolation may not provide sustainable protection to rural residents from the pandemic. The slow progression provides rural areas additional time and opportunity to learn from the experiences in urban areas that were most affected. Rural areas need to be proactive and develop prevention strategies and response plans to manage and control the spread of COVID-19.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.