Volume 10, Issue 1 pp. 49-55
Research Paper

Assessing patient satisfaction with the Medication Management Review service delivered in Jordan

Iman A. Basheti

Iman A. Basheti

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan

Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Odate K.I. Tadros

Odate K.I. Tadros

Department of Biopharmaceutics & Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

Search for more papers by this author
Munther S. Alnajjar

Munther S. Alnajjar

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Search for more papers by this author
Salah Aburuz

Corresponding Author

Salah Aburuz

Department of Biopharmaceutics & Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Al Ain, Abu Dhabi, UAE

Correspondence: Salah Aburuz, Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Al Ain University of Science and Technology, Al Jimi, P.O.Box: 64141, Al Ain, UAE.

E-mails: [email protected], [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 May 2018
Citations: 6

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the effect of the Medication Management Review (MMR) service on the number of treatment-related problems (TRPs), patient satisfaction and factors affecting patient satisfaction.

Methods

This prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted at community pharmacies in Amman, Jordan. Eligible patients were randomized into active and control groups. A validated Pharmaceutical Care Manual was used for data collection and to identify TRPs for both groups. Identified TRPs for patients in the active group were resolved at the pharmacist level or sent to the patients’ physicians for approval and implementation. Patients in both groups were followed up at 3 months to determine the number of TRPs end of the study. Patients in the active group completed a validated, Likert scale MMR-satisfaction questionnaire. Factors affecting satisfaction were assessed through multiple regression analysis.

Key findings

Outpatients with chronic conditions (n = 160) were recruited into the study, with mean age 53.01 ± 15.39; mean number of medical conditions of 3.56 ± 1.15 and 4.73 ± 1.79 mean number of medications. A mean number of 5.37 ± 3.01 TRPs per patient was identified, with no significant difference between both groups (active group n = 82, 5.57 ± 2.68; control n = 78, 5.18 ± 3.36, P = 0.412). At follow-up, significantly lower number of TRPs were identified for patients in the active group compared to patients in the control group (1.06 ± 1.30 versus 4.53 ± 3.43, P < 0.001). Majority of patients were satisfied/very satisfied with the service (n = 77, 94.5%). A lower number of TRPs at follow-up (B = −0.438; t = −4.477, P < 0.001) and higher number of TRPs agreed upon and implemented (B = 0.553; t = 6.949, P < 0.001) were significantly associated with higher level of patient satisfaction.

Conclusion

The MMR has proven to be an effective pharmaceutical care service when delivered in a developing country, such as Jordan. It led to high patient satisfaction, which was significantly associated with lower number of TRPs at follow-up.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.