Volume 51, Issue 11 pp. 1084-1088
Original Article

Randomised controlled trial of a mobile phone infant resuscitation guide

Gavin A Hawkes

Gavin A Hawkes

Department of Paediatrics and Child Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
Geraldine Murphy

Geraldine Murphy

University College Cork, Cork, Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
Eugene M Dempsey

Eugene M Dempsey

Department of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony C Ryan

Corresponding Author

Anthony C Ryan

Department of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland

Correspondence: Prof. Anthony C Ryan, Department of Neonatology, Cork University Maternity Hospital, Cork, Ireland. Fax: +353 21 4920770; email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 August 2015
Citations: 10
Conflict of interest: The authors of this study do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.
Contributorship statement: Gavin Hawkes was involved with manuscript content, data collection, data interpretation and manuscript preparation. Geraldine Murphy was involved in mobile phone guide development, content and study design, data collection, data interpretation and manuscript preparation. Eugene Dempsey was involved in data interpretation and manuscript preparation. C. Anthony Ryan was the supervisor for this study. He was involved with overall content, study design, manuscript preparation, data collection and data interpretation.
Funding: This study was not subject to any external funding.

Abstract

Aim

The aim of this study was to develop a mobile phone resuscitation guide (MPRG) and to evaluate its use during simulated resuscitation of a mannequin.

Methods

An MPRG was developed using EpiSurveyor. A randomised controlled trial was performed in school-going children aged 15–16 years. All subjects were taught infant CPR skills using the American Heart Association InfantCPR Anytime. Two weeks later, the students were randomised to use of MPRG or not, and their CPR skills were re-assessed. The assessment was conducted using previously validated checklists.

Results

Twenty-one students participated in this trial. The MPRG group performed notably better in the areas of calling emergency services (80% vs. 36.4%, P = 0.044), completing sufficient CPR cycles (90% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.047) and following the correct CPR sequence (60% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.013). No difference in resuscitation skills of participants was observed.

Conclusions

We have shown that participants were more likely to call emergency services if they were using the MPRG. Further trials are needed to investigate the utility of mobile phone guides and whether or not they can reduce the time taken to contact emergency services as well as if they can sustain correct CPR sequence in an in-vivo setting.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.