Past applications of the lexical approach to type-noun personality structures have yielded different results compared with those generated for adjectival personality structures, since then new methods have arisen for identifying robust higher-dimensionality structure in data. This research aims to identify an optimal taxonomy of English language type-nouns.

Method

Current study reanalyzed 372 type-nouns from a previous study emphasizing robustness across methodological variations (original vs. ipsatized data, oblique vs. orthogonal rotations, convergence between male and female target ratings) to determine a replicable but more comprehensive model of personality type-noun structure.

Results

A 13-factor original-data oblimin-rotated solution was determined to be the most robust model, except for a one-factor model that was far less comprehensive and informative; an original-data 32-factor oblimin-rotated solution was also fairly robust. Although each of the Big Five adjectival markers indicated a large correlation with one or more type-noun factors; nearly half of the 13 type-noun factors lacked such large correlations with the Big Five.

Conclusions

A high-dimensionality approach thus indicated that type-nouns capture substantial content beyond the Big Five. A comparison with the character-types described by an ancient philosopher (Theophrastus) signified that some granular type-noun dimensions may have stability across multiple millennia.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Supporting Information

REFERENCES

Cheung, F., Cheung, S., Leung, K., Ward, C., & Leong, F. (2003). The English version of the Chinese personality inventory. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 433–452.
10.1177/0022022103034004004
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Cheung, F., Cheung, S., Zhang, J., Leung, K., Leong, F., & Yeh, K. H. (2008). Relevance of openness as a personality dimension in Chinese culture: Aspects of its cultural relevance. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 81–108.
10.1177/0022022107311968
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Condon, D. M., & Mroczek, D. K. (2016). Time to move beyond the Big Five? European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 311.
PubMed Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO-PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.
Google Scholar
De Raad, B., & Hoskens, M. (1990). Personality-descriptive nouns. European Journal of Personality, 4, 131–146.
10.1002/per.2410040206
Web of Science® Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 1138–1151.
10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Diggle, J. (2004). Theophrastus. Characters (Cambridge classical texts and commentaries 43). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1246–1256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1246
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Dixon, R. M. W. (1977). Where have all the adjectives gone? Studies in Language, 1, 19–80.
10.1075/sl.1.1.04dix
Google Scholar
Galvin, A. (1993). Factor scores for 1947 nouns and their variants rated for usefulness. Unpublished research report, University of Colorado at Colorado Springs.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1980). A catalogue of 1947 nouns that can be used to describe personality and a taxonomy of 1342 nouns that are typically so used. Unpublished research report.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1982). From Ace to Zombie: Some explorations in the language of personality. Advances in Personality Assessment, 1, 203–234.
Google Scholar
Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative “description of personality”: The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1216
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of EFA in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 393–416.
10.1177/0013164405282485
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Henss, R. (1998). Type nouns and the five factor model of personality description. European Journal of Personality, 12, 57–71.
10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199801/02)12:1<57::AID-PER293>3.0.CO;2-#
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185.
10.1007/BF02289447
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Merenda, P. F. (1997). A guide to the proper use of factor analysis in the conduct and reporting of research: Pitfalls to avoid. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 30, 156–164.
10.1080/07481756.1997.12068936
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Merton, R. K. (1957). Social theory and social structure. Free Press.
Google Scholar
Mershon, B., & Gorsuch, R. L. (1988). Number of factors in the personality sphere: Does increase in factors increase predictability of real-life criteria? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(4), 675.
10.1037/0022-3514.55.4.675
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (2003). Factor structure of English-language personality type-nouns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(4), 695–708.
10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.695
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Thalmayer, A. G., Payne, D. L., Carlson, R., Sanogo, L., Ole-Kotikash, L., Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Somer, O., Szarota, P., Szirmák, Z., & Zhou, X. (2014). A basic bivariate structure of personality attributes evident across nine languages. Journal of Personality, 82(1), 1–14.
10.1111/jopy.12028
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (2017). Personality, character, and cultural differences: Distinguishing enduring-order versus evolving-order cultures. In A. T. Church (Ed.), The Praeger handbook of personality across cultures: Evolutionary, ecological, and cultural contexts of personality (pp. 265–295). Praeger.
Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (2001). Lexical studies of indigenous personality factors: Premises, products, and prospects. Journal of Personality, 69(6), 847–879.
10.1111/1467-6494.696167
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Saucier, G., & Iurino, K. (2020). High-dimensionality personality structure in the natural language: Further analyses of classic sets of English-language trait-adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1188–1219.
10.1037/pspp0000273
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Saucier, G., Iurino, K., & Thalmayer, A. (2020). Comparing predictive validity in a community sample: High-dimensionality and traditional domain-and-facet structures of personality variation. European Journal of Personality, 34, 1120–1137.
10.1002/per.2235
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Saucier, G. (2022). Culture, personality, and the psychology of religion. Brill. https://brill.com/display/title/63275
10.1163/9789004522831
Google Scholar
Stelmack, R. M., & Stalikas, A. (1991). Galen and the humour theory of temperament. Personality and Individual Differences, 12(3), 255–263.
10.1016/0191-8869(91)90111-N
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Thalmayer, A. G., Saucier, G., Ole-Kotikash, L., & Payne, D. (2020). Personality structure in east and west Africa: Lexical studies of personality in Maa and Supyire-Senufo. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1132.
10.1037/pspp0000264
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Thalmayer, A. G., Job, S., Shino, E. N., Robinson, S. L., & Saucier, G. (2021). ǂŪsigu: A mixed-method lexical study of character description in Khoekhoegowab. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 121(6), 1258.
10.1037/pspp0000372
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
Theophrastus. (1718). The moral characters of Theophrastus ( 3rd ed.) (E. Budgell, Trans.).). Jacob Tonson.
Google Scholar
Theophrastus. (1870). The characters of Theophrastus (R. C. Jebb, Trans.). MacMillan and Co.
Google Scholar
Theophrastus. (1902). The characters of Theophrastus (C. E. Bennett & W. A. Hammond, Trans.). Longmans, Green, and Co.
Google Scholar
Theophrastus. (1924). A book of ‘characters’ from Theophrastus (R. Aldington, Trans.). George Routledge and Sons.
Google Scholar
Theophrastus. (1970). Theophrastus: The character sketches (W. Anderson, Trans.). Kent State University Press.
Google Scholar
Theophrastus. (2004). Characters (J. Diggle, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Wiggins, J. S., Steiger, J. H., & Gaelick, L. (1981). Evaluating circumplexity in personality data. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16, 263–289.
Web of Science® Google Scholar
Zhou, X., Saucier, G., Gao, D., & Liu, J. (2009). The factor structure of Chinese personality terms. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 363–400.
10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00551.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume93, Issue2

April 2025

Pages 425-448

High-dimensionality structure in English-language personality type-nouns

Abstract

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusions

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Supporting Information

REFERENCES

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

High-dimensionality structure in English-language personality type-nouns

Abstract

Objective

Method

Results

Conclusions

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Supporting Information

REFERENCES

References

Related

Information