Volume 36, Issue 5 pp. 1753-1756
Special Section: Trend & Controversies in Type A Aortic Surgery in 21st Century

Management of the aortic root in type A aortic dissection: A valve sparing approach

Eltayeb Mohamed Ahmed MD

Eltayeb Mohamed Ahmed MD

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Edward P. Chen MD

Corresponding Author

Edward P. Chen MD

Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

Correspondence Edward P. Chen, MD, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory School of Medicine, Atlanta 30342, GA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 September 2020
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

Type A acute aortic dissection (TAAAD) is rapidly fatal without emergency repair. Surgical outcomes have improved over the years with improvements in technique and postoperative care. Classically, supracomissural aortic replacement has been the standard of care. However, reintervention rates, particularly on the aortic root in certain groups of patients, shifted the focus towards improving long-term results of surgical repair. With regard to the aortic root, root replacement has been the gold standard. However, the surgical community realized that valve replacement in itself is a disease, and valve sparing aortic root replacement (VSRR) took center stage in the care of these patients.

Methods

We searched the Pubmed and EMBASE databases for articles related to VSRR and composite valve conduit (CVC) root replacement, and the long-term results of these techniques in TAAAD.

Results

Supracomissural repair is limited by reintervention, and CVC results are affected by complications related to the prosthetic valve. Conversely, VSRR is associated with good short-term outcomes, improvement in quality of life, and it is durable.

Conclusion

VSRR is a sound technique in TAAAD in experienced hands.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Eltayeb Mohamed Ahmed prepared the manuscript, and revised the final manuscript. Edward P. Chen prepared the manuscript and revised final manuscript.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.