Volume 23, Issue 11-12 pp. 1502-1519
Review

Instruments for evaluating compliance with infection control practices and factors that affect it: an integrative review

Marília Duarte Valim RN

Corresponding Author

Marília Duarte Valim RN

PhD Student, Nurse and Principal Investigator

Department of Fundamental Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil

Correspondence: Marília Duarte Valim, Nurse and Principal Investigator, Department of Fundamental Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, WHO Collaborating Centre for Nursing Research Development, Av. Bandeirantes, 3900, CEP: 14040-902, São Paulo, Brazil. Telephone: +55 16 36023381.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Maria H Palucci Marziale RN, PhD

Maria H Palucci Marziale RN, PhD

Full Professor

Department of Fundamental Nursing, University of São Paulo at Ribeirão Preto College of Nursing, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Miguel Richart-Martínez PhD

Miguel Richart-Martínez PhD

Full Professor

Nursing Department, University of Alicante, Community of Valencia, Alicante, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ángela Sanjuan-Quiles RN, PhD

Ángela Sanjuan-Quiles RN, PhD

Assistant Professor

Nursing Department, University of Alicante, Community of Valencia, Alicante, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 September 2013
Citations: 38

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To search for instruments to measure compliance with infection control practices and to report on which dimensions and contents the instruments evaluate, their psychometric characteristics, compliance and factors influencing compliance.

Background

Low compliance with infection control practices has been reported among healthcare professionals around the world over the years. Existing data concerning health professionals' compliance with standard precautions are based on measuring instruments.

Design

Integrative review.

Methods

The descriptors were identified and used separately and in combination to search in the following databases: Lilacs, PubMed (MEDLINE), ISI Web of Knowledge, Scopus and CINAHL. The selected articles complied with inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Results

Twenty-three studies were analysed, resulting in the identification of 18 instruments. No instrument addressed all compliance topics, and the most commonly addressed topics were the use of personal protective equipment, hand hygiene and safe practices in the handling of cutting material. Most authors explored content validity and some performed reliability analysis by means of Cronbach's alpha and test–retest. Countries in the sample have different human development indices, and countries with medium and low human development indices show less compliance. Some variables were strong predictors of compliance: training, perceptions of safe environment, perception of obstacles to comply with standard precautions and knowledge.

Conclusions

Compliance is below the recommended levels. Health professionals seem to be selective in following standard precautions. Significant influences include institutional management and psychosocial variables, which deserve further study.

Relevance to clinical practice

Health managers and government policies and interventions should pay greater attention to this subject.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.