Volume 28, Issue 2 pp. 268-273
Gastroenterology

Performance of double-balloon enteroscopy for the management of small bowel polyps in hamartomatous polyposis syndromes

Emmanuel C Gorospe

Emmanuel C Gorospe

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeffrey A Alexander

Jeffrey A Alexander

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David H Bruining

David H Bruining

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth Rajan

Elizabeth Rajan

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song

Corresponding Author

Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence

Dr Louis-Michel Wong Kee Song, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 November 2012
Citations: 11
Conflicts of Interest: None.

Abstract

Background and Aim

Hamartomatous polyposis syndromes (HPS) are a group of rare inherited autosomal dominant disorders. Small bowel polyposis is one of the manifestations of HPS. Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) with polypectomy may obviate repeated small bowel surgeries for polyp intussusception, obstruction, or bleeding. The efficacy and safety of DBE-assisted polypectomy in HPS patients with clinically significant small bowel polyposis were evaluated.

Methods

All HPS patients who underwent DBE from January 2007 to April 2011 were identified using a prospectively maintained database. Data on patient demographics, pre-DBE radiological studies, polyp characteristics, procedural outcomes, and complications were abstracted.

Results

Twenty-two patients underwent a total of 34 DBE procedures. Pre-DBE imaging included computed tomography enterography (n = 15), computed tomography enteroclysis (n = 5), small bowel follow-through (n = 1), and magnetic resonance enterography (n = 1). Any small bowel polyp ≥ 1 cm in size on radiological imaging was referred for DBE-assisted polypectomy. Antegrade and retrograde DBE were successful in reaching and resecting targeted polyps in 90% (18/20) and 71.4% (10/14) of procedures, respectively. The overall success rate for DBE-assisted polypectomy was 82.3% (95% confidence interval: 66.5–91.6%). The median size of resected polyps was 2 cm (range 1–5 cm) and all were hamartomas. Minor adverse events occurred in four (11.8%) procedures, including abdominal pain (n = 2), immediate post-polypectomy bleeding (n = 1), and self-limited hematochezia (n = 1).

Conclusions

DBE-assisted polypectomy was successful in over 80% of HPS patients with an acceptable margin of safety. To the knowledge of the authors, this is one of the largest single-center studies to report on the performance and safety of DBE-assisted polypectomy in HPS patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.