Volume 29, Issue 4 pp. 689-697
Original Article

Reticular erythematous mucinosis: histopathological and immunohistochemical features of 25 patients compared with 25 cases of lupus erythematosus tumidus

E. Cinotti

Corresponding Author

E. Cinotti

Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Section of Dermatology, University Hospital of Saint-Etienne, Saint-Etienne, France

Correspondence: E. Cinotti. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
V. Merlo

V. Merlo

Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
W. Kempf

W. Kempf

Kempf and Pfaltz, Histological Diagnostics and Department of Dermatology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
C. Carli

C. Carli

Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences (DISC), Pathology Unit University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
J. Kanitakis

J. Kanitakis

Department of Dermatology, Ed. Herriot Hospital Group, Lyon, France

Search for more papers by this author
A. Parodi

A. Parodi

Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
F. Rongioletti

F. Rongioletti

Section of Dermatology, Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Sciences (DISC), Pathology Unit University of Genoa and IRCCS San Martino-IST University Hospital, Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 August 2014
Citations: 32

Conflicts of interest:

None.

Funding sources:

None.

Abstract

Background and objectives

Reticular erythematous mucinosis (REM) and lupus erythematosus tumidus (LET) share similarities. However, to our knowledge no study extensively compared the histological features of these two conditions. The aim of this study is to compare the histological and immunohistochemical features of REM and LET.

Methods

We evaluated epidermal thickness, hyperkeratosis, dermo-epidermal junction changes, interstitial mucin deposition, vessel dilatation and pattern, type and density of the inflammatory infiltrate in 25 cases of REM and LET. Anti-CD3, anti-CD20, anti-CD68, anti-CD4, anti-CD8, anti-CD123, anti-CD2AP, anti-IgG and anti-C3 antibodies were tested in a subset of patients.

Results

Both diseases are characterized by perivascular dermal infiltrates of lymphocytes mainly CD4+ positive and increased dermal mucin. However, REM tended to show more scattered and more superficial lymphocytes with more superficial mucin and to have less frequent immunoglobulin and complement depositions along the dermo-epidermal junction. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (PDCs) were less represented in REM, and were mainly found as single cells differently from LET.

Conclusions

REM and LET present some differences in the infiltrate, including PDCs, the mucin deposition and the immunoreactant deposition at the dermo-epidermal junction that justify the distinction of the two diseases and suggest different pathogenetic mechanisms.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.