Volume 48, Issue 6 pp. 843-858
SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Pocket resolution in regenerative treatment of intrabony defects with papilla preservation techniques: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Mario Aimetti

Corresponding Author

Mario Aimetti

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Correspondence

Mario Aimetti, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, Via Nizza 230, Turin 10126, Italy.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Adriano Fratini

Adriano Fratini

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Valeria Manavella

Valeria Manavella

Private practice, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Marta Giraudi

Marta Giraudi

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Filippo Citterio

Filippo Citterio

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Ferrarotti

Francesco Ferrarotti

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giulia Maria Mariani

Giulia Maria Mariani

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Cairo

Francesco Cairo

Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Research Unit in Periodontology and Periodontal Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Giacomo Baima

Giacomo Baima

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Federica Romano

Federica Romano

Department of Surgical Sciences, C.I.R. Dental School, Section of Periodontology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 January 2021
Citations: 24

Abstract

Aim

To systematically assess the clinical performance of different approaches for periodontal regeneration of intrabony defects in terms of pocket resolution compared to access surgery with papilla preservation techniques (PPTs).

Material and Methods

Systematic literature searches were conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, and CENTRAL up to April 2020 to identify RCTs on regenerative treatment [guided tissue regeneration (GTR) or enamel matrix derivative (EMD) with or without biomaterials] of intrabony defects using PPTs. Results were expressed as weighted mean percentages (WMP) or risk ratios of pocket resolution at 12 months (considering both final PD ≤ 3 mm and ≤4 mm).

Results

A total of 12 RCTs were included. Based on a final PD ≤ 3 mm or PD ≤ 4 mm, the WMP of pocket resolution was 61.4% and 92.1%, respectively. EMD and GTR obtained comparable results. Pairwise meta-analysis identified a greater probability of achieving pocket resolution for GTR compared to PPTs. The number needed to treat for GTR to obtain one extra intrabony defect achieving PD ≤ 3 mm or PD ≤ 4 mm over PPTs was 2 and 4, respectively.

Conclusion

Regenerative surgery represents a viable approach to obtain final PD ≤ 4 mm in the short-term.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors report no conflicts of interest related to this study. There was no external funding for this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.