Volume 47, Issue 10 pp. 1201-1208
ORIGINAL ARTICLE CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY

Determining the minimal important difference of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Chronic Periodontitis

Song-lin He

Corresponding Author

Song-lin He

College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China

Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing, China

Correspondence

Song-lin He, Stomatological Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 7, Shang Qing Si Road, Chongqing 400015, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Hai-juan Hou

Hai-juan Hou

College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China

Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jin-hua Wang

Jin-hua Wang

College of Stomatology, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China

Chongqing Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases and Biomedical Sciences, Chongqing, China

Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education, Chongqing, China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 August 2020
Citations: 2

Funding information

This research is funded by the Program for Innovation Team Building at Institutions of Higher Education in Chongqing in 2016 and the Chongqing Municipal Key Laboratory of Oral Biomedical Engineering of Higher Education.

Abstract

Aim

Building on previous psychometric work, we aimed to further assess the minimally important difference (MID) of the Oral Health Impact Profile for Chronic Periodontitis (OHIP-CP).

Methods

In total, 240 consecutive patients with chronic periodontitis were recruited in the study. The OHIP-CP was completed at baseline and after six weeks. Methodology testing included the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and MID. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess the fit of the previously proposed three-factor model. The MID of this questionnaire was determined by applying anchor-based and distribution-based approaches.

Results

The CFA supported a three-factor model for the OHIP-CP with acceptable fit to the data. The fit indices were χ2/df = 2.231, GFI = 0.935, TLI = 0.969 and CFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.076. The OHIP-CP scores showed significant improvements after treatment (p < .001). The anchor-based MIDs of OHIP-CP for “oral function restriction,” “oral pain” and “psychological and social impact,” and total score were 2, 1, 4 and 7 points, respectively. The effect sizes (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) for the OHIP-CP were moderate to large.

Conclusions

The MID of the OHIP-CP is recommended for interpreting clinically meaningful change in oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) over time.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have stated explicitly that there are no conflicts of interest in connection with this article.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.