Volume 36, Issue 4 pp. 762-770
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Left Bundle Branch Pacing Impact on QRS Amplitude in Different Pacing Voltages

Shengchan Wang

Shengchan Wang

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jie Geng

Jie Geng

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wen Yang

Wen Yang

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhixin Jiang

Zhixin Jiang

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xiujuan Zhou

Xiujuan Zhou

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Wanying Jiang

Wanying Jiang

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Shigeng Zhang

Shigeng Zhang

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Qijun Shan

Corresponding Author

Qijun Shan

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China

Correspondence: Qijun Shan ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 January 2025

Shengchan Wang and Jie Geng contributed equally to this work.

ABSTRACT

Background

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) emerged as a novel physiological pacing modality that improves clinical outcomes. This study aimed to explore the impact of LBBP on QRS wave amplitude (RWA).

Methods

This prospective observational study included patients with complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB) and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication, as well as patients with QRSd < 120 ms and pacemaker indication. During the procedure, when the LBBP lead reached the target site, 12-lead ECGs at baseline and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 times the pacing thresholds and 3.5 V (pacemaker default value) pacing were recorded, and RWA values were measured accordingly. The absolute values of I + aVL, II + III+ aVF, and V1 + V2 + V3 + V4 + V5 + V6 RWA were defined as X-, Y-, and Z-axis ΣRWA.

Results

A total of 195 consecutive patients (50 CLBBB and 145 narrow QRS) were enrolled (69.7 ± 10.3 years, 52.3% male). Compared with the baseline, LBBP significantly increased X- and Y-axis ΣRWA independent of pacing voltage in CLBBB (ΔX/Y-axis 0.49 ± 0.78 mV, p < 0.0001/0.61 ± 1.24 mV, p = 0.001) and narrow QRS group (ΔX/Y-axis 0.88 ± 0.61 mV, p < 0.0001/0.91 ± 1.05 mV, p < 0.0001); LBBP significantly reduced Z-axis ΣRWA in CLBBB patients (ΔZ-axis −2.64 ± 3.67 mV, p < 0.0001) but not in narrow QRS group (ΔZ-axis −0.14 ± 1.87 mV, p = 0.36). LBBP significantly improved cardiac function at 1 week of follow-up.

Conclusions

LBBP significantly increased X/Y-axis ΣRWA independent of pacing voltage in CLBBB and narrow QRS patients. LBBP significantly reduced Z-axis ΣRWA in CLBBB but not in narrow QRS patients. Whether these ΣRWA changes, through enhancing whole myocardial contractility, have a synergistic effect with LBBP synchronization to further improve cardiac function remains to be investigated.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.