Volume 29, Issue 3 pp. 477-481
CASE REPORT

Troubleshooting electromagnetic interference in a patient with centrifugal flow left ventricular assist device and subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Asim S. Ahmed DO

Asim S. Ahmed DO

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Parin J. Patel MD

Parin J. Patel MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Shiv Bagga MD

Shiv Bagga MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jasen L. Gilge MD

Jasen L. Gilge MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Schleeter MD

Thomas Schleeter MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Baqir A. Lakhani DO

Baqir A. Lakhani DO

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ashwin K. Ravichandran MD

Ashwin K. Ravichandran MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Donnelley MSS

Steve Donnelley MSS

Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Venu Allavatam MSEE

Venu Allavatam MSEE

Boston Scientific, St. Paul, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Eric N. Prystowsky MD

Eric N. Prystowsky MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Benzy J. Padanilam MD

Corresponding Author

Benzy J. Padanilam MD

St. Vincent Medical Group, St. Vincent Hospital, Indianapolis, IN, USA

Correspondence

Benzy J. Padanilam, MD, St. Vincent Medical Group, 8333 Naab Road, Suite 400, Indianapolis, IN 46260.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 January 2018
Citations: 21

This manuscript was processed by a guest editor.

S. Donnelley and V. Allavatam are employed in the Engineering department of Boston Scientific. Other authors: No disclosures.

Abstract

A 25-year-old man with severe nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD) implant and subsequently underwent HeartWare ventricular assist device (HVAD) placement. Postoperative interrogation revealed both primary and secondary S-ICD vectors inappropriately regarded sinus rhythm as “noise,” and the alternate vector significantly undersensed sinus rhythm. The S-ICD was reinterrogated using high-resolution capture to visually confirm EMI with a dominant frequency in both the primary and secondary vectors of 46.67 Hz that fell within the S-ICD operational range of 9–60 Hz. The 46.67 Hz frequency correlated with the HVAD operational speed of 2,800 RPM. The HVAD pump speed was increased from 2,800 to 3,000 RPM, resulting in a dominant frequency of 50 Hz. The notch filter is nonprogrammable in S-ICDs. However, the built-in filter is 50 Hz for countries in European time zones as opposed to 60 Hz in US time zones due to differences in the anticipated noise from electrical sources within each continent. Thus, the S-ICD time zone was reprogrammed from EST to GMT, which reduced the notch filter from 60  to 50 Hz, resulting in S-ICD successfully eliminating EMI when the patient was in a supine position. The EMI interference was still intermittently present in the upright patient position. This case demonstrates the utility of high-resolution electrogram capture to identify the source and frequency of EMI in S-ICD and offers a potential avenue to troubleshoot dominant frequency oversensing by changing the device time zone.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.