Volume 29, Issue 3 pp. 365-374
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

REduction of THRomboembolic EVents during Ablation using the laserballoon: The RETHREVA registry

Martin Eichenlaub MD

Martin Eichenlaub MD

Isar Heart Center, Munich, Germany

Peter Osypka Heart Center, Munich, Germany

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Arne Pfeufer MD, MSc

Arne Pfeufer MD, MSc

Institute of Bioinformatics and Systems Biology, Helmholtz Zentrum Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Lars Behrens MD

Lars Behrens MD

Institute of Neuroradiology, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Volker Klauss MD

Volker Klauss MD

Kardiologie Innenstadt, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Roettinger MD

Michael Roettinger MD

Institute of Neuroradiology, Munich, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Turgut Brodherr MD

Turgut Brodherr MD

Isar Heart Center, Munich, Germany

Drs. Brodherr and Lewalter contributed equally to this article.

Search for more papers by this author
Thorsten Lewalter MD, PhD

Corresponding Author

Thorsten Lewalter MD, PhD

Isar Heart Center, Munich, Germany

Peter Osypka Heart Center, Munich, Germany

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Bonn, Germany

Drs. Brodherr and Lewalter contributed equally to this article.

Correspondence

Thorsten Lewalter, Peter Osypka Heart Center, Am Isarkanal 36, 81379 Munich, Germany.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 January 2018
Citations: 2

Disclosures: None.

Abstract

Introduction

Cerebral events (CEs), including silent (SCEs), are a known complication of left atrial catheter ablation (LACA) in patients with atrial fibrillation. The aim of this prospective registry was to gain more information about CEs during laserballoon LACA and to reduce the risk of their occurrence.

Methods and results

We enrolled 74 patients (age 61 ± 11 years; 74% male; CHA2DS2-VASc 1.9 ± 1.4).

Cerebral MRI (1.5 Tesla) was performed to detect CEs. ASPItest identified aspirin-resistant patients (ARPs). All bleeding complications were recorded.

Due to an initial high CE rate, we evolved our clinical procedure step-by-step arriving at an optimized protocol:

  • Group 1: heparin after single transseptal puncture (TP), activated clotting time (ACT) > 300 seconds (CE: 64.3%).
  • Group 2: heparin after double TP, ACT > 300 seconds; 2a without (CE: 45.5%, RRR: −29.2%) and 2b with additional intravenous aspirin (CE: 36.4%, RRR: −43.4%; excluding ARP: 30%, RRR: −53.3%).
  • Group 3: heparin before double TP, ACT > 350 seconds; 3a without (CE: 54.5%, RRR: −15.2%) and 3b with aspirin (CE: 18.5%, RRR: −71.2%; excluding ARP: 8.7%, RRR: −86.5%).

Larger LA diameter > 44 mm (OR: 1.149, P  =  0.005) and no aspirin use (OR: 4.308, P  =  0.008) were CE risk factors in multivariate logistic regression. In those patients receiving aspirin, aspirin resistance (OR: 22.4, P  =  0.011) was an exceptionally strong risk factor.

Conclusion

These data support the use of intravenous aspirin including monitoring of aspirin resistance in addition to ACT-guided heparin. An optimized protocol of heparin before TP, double TP, and intravenous aspirin in non-ARP resulted in a significantly lowered CE incidence and severity.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.