Volume 52, Issue 3 pp. 1631-1665
ARTICLE

Directors' Bankruptcy Experience and Financial Reporting Choices

Akram Khalilov

Corresponding Author

Akram Khalilov

Department of Accounting and Operations Management, BI Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway

Correspondence: Akram Khalilov ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Irina Gazizova

Irina Gazizova

Department of Accounting, Stockholm School of Economics, Stockholm, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Beatriz Garcia Osma

Beatriz Garcia Osma

Department of Business, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Getafe, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 February 2025
Funding: Irina Gazizova acknowledges funding from the Tore-Browaldh Foundation and the Sven-Erik Johansson Foundation Grant and Beatriz Garcia Osma from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (TED2021-129861B-I00 and PID2023-150744NB-C43) and CAM (PRICIT, EPUC3M12).

[Correction added on 8 March 2025, after first online publication: The third author Beatriz García Osma's affiliation has been retained as Department of Business Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Getafe, Madrid, Spain.]

ABSTRACT

We identify directors who experience a corporate bankruptcy and examine how this professional experience affects monitoring at the other firms where they concurrently sit on the board. Using a sample of US directors interlocked with firms that file for bankruptcy, we find that directors have a greater tolerance for real earnings management after a low-cost bankruptcy experience. This effect is stronger for independent directors and those who sit on the audit committee, consistent with a ratification and monitoring explanation. We do not find evidence consistent with the competing hypotheses that bankruptcy leads to directors' distraction or incentivizes efficient cost-cutting strategies. We contribute to the research on the influence of directors' corporate experience over corporate outcomes, by providing evidence suggesting that surviving a bankruptcy relatively unscathed lowers directors' perception of the severity of distress costs, with negative consequences for decision control.

Data Availability Statement

Data used in this paper are available from public sources identified

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.