Volume 31, Issue 5 pp. 885-896
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Development of a cognitive behavioural therapy-based guided self-help intervention for adults with intellectual disability

Meg McQueen

Meg McQueen

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Ashleigh Blinkhorn

Ashleigh Blinkhorn

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Adam Broad

Adam Broad

School of Rehabilitations Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Jessica Jones

Jessica Jones

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Farooq Naeem

Farooq Naeem

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Muhammad Ayub

Corresponding Author

Muhammad Ayub

Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Correspondence

Muhammad Ayub Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 March 2018
Citations: 9

Abstract

Background

Despite strong evidence for cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) in treating mental health, its use, thus far, has been limited for people with intellectual disabilities. This study describes a CBT-based guided self-help (CBT-GSH) manual for individuals with intellectual disability, and focus groups explore the views of clinicians, therapists, support staff and managers.

Material and methods

Using a qualitative methodology, an expert team adapted the manual. Focus groups provided feedback, followed by thematic content analysis for modifications.

Results

Participants supported using the manual, with varying views about the delivery. Quality of relationships and competence of the administrator determined the best person to deliver the treatment. Heterogeneity in the intellectual disability population was a challenge to delivering manual-based interventions. Participants made suggestions about language and organization.

Conclusions

Amendments were made to the manual in line with expert feedback. An evaluation is warranted to test for feasibility, delivery, acceptability and efficacy.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.