Volume 67, Issue 7 pp. 391-397

Assessing the environment for regulatory change for eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid nutrition labeling

Amy M Brownawell

Corresponding Author

Amy M Brownawell

Life Sciences Research Office, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

AM Brownawell, Life Sciences Research Office, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20814-3998, USA. E-mail: [email protected], Phone: +1-301-634-7030, Fax: +1-301-634-7876.Search for more papers by this author
William S Harris

William S Harris

University of South Dakota School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, South Dakota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph R Hibbeln

Joseph R Hibbeln

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, Bethesda, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
David M Klurfeld

David M Klurfeld

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ian Newton

Ian Newton

Ceres Consulting, Markham, Ontario, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Allison Yates

Allison Yates

USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author

Disclaimer: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and not those of their respective government agencies or organizations.

Abstract

This review examines issues related to the development of a recommended daily allowance or adequate intake, two of the categories of dietary reference intakes, for the long-chain omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (omega-3 PUFAs), eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA, 20:5 n-3), and docosahexaenoic acid (DHA, 22:6 n-3). Although some have suggested a dietary intake of two servings of fatty fish per week or supplement intake of 500 mg/day EPA plus DHA, based on evidence from epidemiologic and clinical studies of cardiovascular benefit from regular fish or fish-oil consumption, supplementation with EPA and/or DHA may also have antidepressant and mood-stabilizing effects. Omega-3 PUFA biology is complex and chronic disease outcomes are sometimes difficult to prove, yet the possibility of benefit for a substantial portion of the population from increased omega-3 PUFA intake is a public health issue that must be addressed responsibly and be based on significant scientific evidence.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.