Volume 29, Issue 1 pp. 105-126

Federalists in the Attic: Original Intent, the Heritage Movement, and Democratic Theory

Daniel Levin

Daniel Levin

Daniel Levin is an assistant professor at the University of Utah in Salt Lake City. I thank Mark Button for his close reading and many insights.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2006
Citations: 2

Abstract

Although the United States is often criticized for its lack of historical consciousness, historicity provides a compelling rhetorical trump in constitutional argument, particularly according to advocates of original under-standing jurisprudence or “originalism.” Originalism has also proven to be quite popular as a constitutional position, especially in public discourse outside academe and the courts. I argue that originalism's appeal derives from Americans’interest in heritage. Using the literature on public history, memory, and cultural studies to distinguish the cultural phenomenon of heritage from history proper, I argue that originalism, like heritage, offers the possibility of an immediate and authentic encounter with the past tied to a critique of modernism as both antidemocratic and inauthentic. Originalism portrays the federal period as a special moment of civic unity, whose virtues have been preserved by the larger public, but have been eroded among elites by modernity.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.