Volume 4, Issue 6 pp. 1626-1634

ORIGINAL RESEARCH—OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT: Validation of the Erection Hardness Score

John P. Mulhall MD

Corresponding Author

John P. Mulhall MD

Weill Medical College of Cornell University and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA;

John P. Mulhall, MD, Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York Presbyterian Hospital & Memorial Sloane Kettering Cancer Center, 525 East 68th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. Tel: 212-746-5653; Fax: 212-746-0403; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Irwin Goldstein MD

Irwin Goldstein MD

Sexual Medicine, Alvarado Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA;

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew G. Bushmakin MS

Andrew G. Bushmakin MS

Pfizer Inc, Global Research & Development, Groton, CT, USA;

Search for more papers by this author
Joseph C. Cappelleri PhD, MPH

Joseph C. Cappelleri PhD, MPH

Pfizer Inc, Global Research & Development, Groton, CT, USA;

Search for more papers by this author
Kyle Hvidsten MPH

Kyle Hvidsten MPH

Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 September 2007
Citations: 73

ABSTRACT

Introduction. Erection hardness is a fundamental component of erectile function, and is a very specific and easily monitored outcome. The Erection Hardness Score (EHS) is a single-item, patient-reported outcome (PRO) for scoring erection hardness.

Aims. The aim of this article is to report the psychometric validation of the EHS.

Methods. The dataset (N = 307) was from a multinational sildenafil trial (efficacy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction [ED]) with a 2-week screening phase, a 6-week double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase, and a 6-week open-label extension.

Main Outcome Measures. Test–retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), quality and distribution of responses, known-groups validity (ability to differentiate between ED severity groups defined by the International Index of Erectile Function [IIEF] questionnaire), convergent validity (Pearson correlation coefficients with domain scores of the IIEF and the Quality of Erection Questionnaire [QEQ]), treatment responsiveness, and clinically important difference.

Results. The EHS demonstrated good test–retest reliability, acceptable quality and distribution of responses, known-groups validity against the IIEF (including clear differentiation between normal and impaired erectile function), moderate-to-strong convergent validity against the prespecified domains of the IIEF and QEQ, and high treatment responsiveness.

Conclusion. The EHS has desirable measurement properties, including being highly responsive to treatment. This one-item PRO is robust and easy to use for evaluating erection hardness. Psychometric analysis supports the use of the EHS as a simple, reliable, and valid tool for the assessment of erection hardness in clinical trials research. Mulhall JP, Goldstein I, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, and Hvidsten K. Validation of the Erection Hardness Score. J Sex Med 2007;4:1626–1634.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.