Volume 97, Issue 1 pp. 41-45

Do parental ratings on cognition reflect neuropsychological outcome in congenital heart disease?

Marijke Miatton

Marijke Miatton

Laboratory for Neuropsychology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Daniël De Wolf

Daniël De Wolf

Paediatric Cardiology, Department of Paediatrics, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Katrien François

Katrien François

Paediatric Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Evert Thiery

Evert Thiery

Reference Centre for Refractory Epilepsy, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Guy Vingerhoets

Guy Vingerhoets

Laboratory for Neuropsychology, Department of Internal Medicine, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 December 2007
Citations: 7
Correspondence
Marijke Miatton, Laboratory for Neuropsychology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 4 K 3, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Tel.: +32-9-240-45-45 | Fax: +32-9-240-45-55 | Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim: To describe the parental view of the cognitive skills of their child with a surgically corrected congenital heart disease (CHD) and compare it to objectified cognitive measures in children with CHD 6–12 years postoperatively.

Methods: Parents completed a questionnaire on several cognitive functions of their child. Children with CHD and healthy controls (n = 86, aged 8 years 8 months ± 1 year 6 months) underwent an abbreviated IQ-testing and a neurodevelopmental assessment.

Results: Parents of the children with CHD more frequently indicated lower sustained attention (p < 0.05), lower divided attention (p < 0.001), more problems with memory and learning skills (p < 0.05), and deficient gross motor functioning (p < 0.01) compared to the parents of healthy controls. Intellectual and neuropsychological assessment revealed a lower estimated full-scale IQ (p < 0.01), worse sensorimotor functioning (p < 0.001), and lower performances on language (p < 0.001), attention/executive functioning (p < 0.05), and memory (p < 0.05) in the CHD-group. Several items of the questionnaire were significant predictors for worse neurodevelopmental outcome.

Conclusion: Overall, the objective and subjective measures on cognitive functioning are in agreement and indicate the presence of neurocognitive deficits in children with CHD. This study endorses the accuracy and usefulness of a parental questionnaire to report on the cognitive functioning of the child and urges the investigation of neurocognitive functioning in children with CHD at follow-up.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.