Volume 24, Issue 1 pp. 56-59

Can mobile skin conductance assessments be helpful in signalling imminent inpatient aggression?

Eric Kuijpers

Eric Kuijpers

GGZ Eindhoven, Department of research and development, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Henk Nijman

Corresponding Author

Henk Nijman

Forensic Psychology, Behavioural Science Institute (BSI), Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

Altrecht Mental Health Institute, Division Altrecht Aventurijn, Den Dolder, The Netherlands

Henk Nijman GGZ Altrecht, Altrecht Aventurijn (Department Roosenburg), Dolderse weg 164, 3734 BN, The Netherlands.
Tel: ++31 302256246;
Fax: ++31 302256963;
E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Inge M.B. Bongers

Inge M.B. Bongers

Evidence Based Management in Mental Health Care, University of Tilburg, Tilburg, The Netherlands

Research and Development Department, GGZ Eindhoven, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Matty Lubberding

Matty Lubberding

GGZ Eindhoven, Department of research and development, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Martin Ouwerkerk

Martin Ouwerkerk

Philips Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 July 2011
Citations: 1

Abstract

Kuijpers E, Nijman H, Bongers IMB, Lubberding M, Ouwerkerk M. Can mobile skin conductance assessments be helpful in signalling imminent inpatient aggression?

Background: A well-known technique to assess (psychological) arousal is to measure the skin conductance level (SCL). Although widely used in experimental psychological research, this technique has not been used often in (locked) psychiatric admission settings on patients who are at a high risk of engaging in aggressive behaviour. One of the obvious reasons for this is that measuring skin conductance, until recently, required a substantial amount of equipment.

Methods: As technology developed, it became possible to develop small wearable devices in the form of regular watches to measure the SCL as well as other psycho-physiological parameters. To illustrate the potential this may have for the prevention of aggressive behaviour, a case description is provided of a patient in crisis who became physically aggressive while wearing a skin conductance measurement device.

Results: Interestingly, the SCL of the patient had been rising sharply before the first signs of aggressive behaviour were visible.

Conclusion: Although it concerns an anecdotal case study, this finding suggests that measuring SCL on a continuous basis in patients who are at a high risk of becoming violent, without this procedure having to interfere with their daily life, may open new avenues for preventing aggression at an earlier stage. A large-scale empirical study in a substantial number of (potentially aggressive) patients is needed, however, to investigate the predictive validity of mobile skin conductance assessments on imminent inpatient aggression in a reliable way.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.