Volume 39, Issue 11 pp. 1010-1015
Original Article

PI3K, Rac1 and pPAK1 are overexpressed in extramammary Paget's disease

Yue Qian

Yue Qian

Department of Dermatology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China

These authors have contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Na Zhang

Na Zhang

Department of Dermatology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China

These authors have contributed equally to this work.

Search for more papers by this author
Siyuan Chen

Siyuan Chen

Department of Dermatology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China

Search for more papers by this author
Shujuan Chu

Shujuan Chu

Department of Anesthesiology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China

Search for more papers by this author
Aiping Feng

Corresponding Author

Aiping Feng

Department of Dermatology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China

Aiping Feng,

Department of Dermatology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430022, China

Tel: 86-27-85726157

Fax: 86-27-85726159

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Houjun Liu

Houjun Liu

Department of Dermatology, Union Hospital, Tongji medical college, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430022 China

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2012
Citations: 2

Abstract

Background

Phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K), Ras-related C3 botulinum toxin substrate 1 (Rac1) and P21-activated protein kinase 1 (PAK1) appear to play important roles in the pathogenesis of several tumors, but their expressions in extramammary Paget's disease (EMPD) have not been investigated yet.

Objectives

To investigate the potential contribution of the PI3K, Rac1 and PAK1 to the development of EMPD.

Methods

Thirty-five paraffin-embedded EMPD specimens were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for PI3K (85α), Rac1 and pPAK1.

Results

All the 35 primary EMPD specimens, including 20 non-invasive EMPD, 13 invasive EMPD and 2 metastatic lymph nodes, showed cytoplasm overexpression of PI3K (85α), Rac1 and pPAK1. The expression (% positive cells) of PI3K(85α), Rac1 and pPAK1 (90.1 ± 8.6, 91.4 ± 9.5 and 89.6 ± 10.8% ) in EMPD were significantly higher than in apocrine glands of normal skin ( 20.1 ± 11.9, 29.8 ± 8.9, 41.1 ± 13.4%), and the expression in invasive EMPD with lymph node metastasis (98.2 ± 1.7, 98.8 ± 0.7 and 98.4 ± 0.9%) are significantly higher than in invasive EMPD without lymph node metastasis (94.1 ± 2.6, 96.5 ± 1.7 and 95.3 ± 1.1%) and non-invasive EMPD (85.2 ± 8.4, 87.1 ± 9.9 and 83.1 ± 10.6%). There were significant positive correlations of the expression levels between PI3K (85α) and Rac1, as well as between Rac1 and pPAK1 in EMPD.

Conclusions

These results indicate that PI3K, Rac1 and PAK1 may play important roles in the pathogenesis of EMPD.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.