Volume 18, Issue 5 pp. xiii-xx

EAO Communication

Current state of training for implant dentistry in Europe: a questionnaire-based survey

Christoph Vasak

Christoph Vasak

Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Fiederer

Robert Fiederer

Academy for Oral Implantology, Postgraduate Training Facility affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Georg Watzek

Georg Watzek

Department of Oral Surgery, Bernhard Gottlieb School of Dentistry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Academy for Oral Implantology, Postgraduate Training Facility affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 September 2007
Citations: 20
Correspondence to:
Christoph Vasak, MD, DMD
Department of Oral Surgery
University Clinic of Dentistry
Waehringer Strasse 25a
A-1090 Vienna
Austria
Tel.: +43 1 4277 67011
Fax: +43 1 4277 67019
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objectives: Thanks to their predictably high-success rates, dental implants have gained a firm place among the treatment options for edentulous and partially dentate patients in state-of-the-art dentistry. As a result, the need for high-level basic and continued training in implant dentistry is increasing. The present questionnaire-based survey was designed to shed light on the current state of implant training, any points of criticism and the need for a standardized training format in Europe.

Material and methods: Between July and November 2006, a 14-item questionnaire was sent to 37 opinion leaders in 29 European countries. The questionnaires sent back were processed electronically and evaluated statistically.

Results: 82.8% of the participating opinion leaders responded. In the majority of the participating countries (87.5%), courses are funded by the industry. Most of the courses (43%) are confined to a few days and mainly consist of lectures in theory and hands-on training. Of the attendees, most are general dental practitioners (29%). These perform as many implant treatments as specialized dentists. In 83% of the participating countries, a standardized certified training format in implant dentistry is considered to be required.

Conclusion: As implant dentistry is increasingly shifting from competence centers to general dental practitioners in the practice setting, standardized training concluded with a certified diploma has become necessary. This would provide for more transparency and for disseminating state-of-the-art knowledge independent of the implant-manufacturing industry.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.