Volume 55, Issue 2 pp. 508-512

Comparison of Frequentist Methods for Estimating the Total Weight of Consignments of Drugs

Ivo Alberink Ph.D.

Ivo Alberink Ph.D.

Netherlands Forensic Institute, PO Box 24044, 2490 AA, The Hague, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Annabel Bolck Ph.D.

Annabel Bolck Ph.D.

Netherlands Forensic Institute, PO Box 24044, 2490 AA, The Hague, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Reinoud D. Stoel Ph.D.

Reinoud D. Stoel Ph.D.

Netherlands Forensic Institute, PO Box 24044, 2490 AA, The Hague, The Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2010
Citations: 3
Additional information and reprint requests:
Ivo Alberink, Ph.D.
P.O. Box 24044
2490 AA Den Haag
The Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: A topic in forensic statistics is the estimation of the total weight of consignments of drugs based on subsamples of which a certain fraction may not contain drugs at all. The frequentist approach to this concentrates on obtaining confidence intervals for the total weight, based on estimation of the fraction of drugs and the mean and variance of the weights of drug units. The current study shows that the resulting confidence intervals are basically unreliable, since they are based on an underestimation of the variation of the underlying statistical process. Two alternatives are given that yield asymptotically correct results. These are not reliable for small subsamples either, though, because of the inherent multimodal behaviour of the sample mean. In cases where a relatively large fraction of the consignment contains no drugs, the confidence intervals reported in the literature should not be used in practice.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.