Volume 54, Issue 4 pp. 739-745

DNA Preservation in Skeletal Elements from the World Trade Center Disaster: Recommendations for Mass Fatality Management* ,†

Amy Z. Mundorff M.A.

Amy Z. Mundorff M.A.

Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York City, NY.

Present address: Amy Z. Mundorff, Department of Archaeology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Eric J. Bartelink Ph.D.

Eric J. Bartelink Ph.D.

Department of Anthropology, California State University, Chico, 400 West First Street, Chico, CA 95929-0400.

Search for more papers by this author
Elaine Mar-Cash M.S.

Elaine Mar-Cash M.S.

Office of Chief Medical Examiner, New York City, NY.

Present address: Elaine Mar-Cash, Holden Dr., Ann Arbor, MI.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 June 2009
Citations: 130
Additional information and reprint requests:
Amy Z. Mundorff, M.A.
Department of Archaeology
Simon Fraser University
8888 University Drive
Burnaby, BC V5A 1S6
Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the 59th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, San Antonio, TX, February 19–24, 2007.

Funded by a Trudeau Foundation Scholarship and a Special Graduate Entrance Scholarship from Simon Fraser University.

Abstract

Abstract: The World Trade Center (WTC) victim identification effort highlights taphonomic influences on the degradation of DNA from victims of mass fatality incidents. This study uses a subset of the WTC-Human Remains Database to evaluate differential preservation of DNA by skeletal element. Recovery location, sex, and victim type (civilian, firefighter, or plane passenger) do not appear to influence DNA preservation. Results indicate that more intact elements, as well as elements encased in soft tissue, produced slightly higher identification rates than more fragmented remains. DNA identification rates by element type conform to previous findings, with higher rates generally found in denser, weight-bearing bones. However, smaller bones including patellae, metatarsals, and foot phalanges yielded rates comparable to both femora and tibiae. These elements can be easily sampled with a disposable scalpel, and thus reduce potential DNA contamination. These findings have implications for DNA sampling guidelines in future mass fatality incidents.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.