State Abortion Policies, Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider Laws, and Abortion Demand
Abstract
Targeted Regulation of Abortion Provider laws (or TRAP laws) are state laws that apply only to abortion providers and impose on them licensing fees, physical plant/personnel regulations, and requirements that exceed those imposed on other comparable health-care providers or medical facilities. According to prochoice supporters, the explicit or implicit goal of TRAP laws is to drive abortion providers from the market and reduce the supply of abortion services. This paper examines whether a state TRAP licensing fee or a TRAP plant/personnel law also has an independent impact on women's demand for abortion over the period 1982–2005. The empirical results find that neither state TRAP law has a statistically significant independent effect on women's abortion demand. The empirical results remain robust even after controlling for time-varying factors or the time period after the Supreme Court's landmark 1992 Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey decision.
References
- Althaus, F. A., & Henshaw, S. K. (1994). The effects of mandatory delay laws on abortion patients and providers. Family Planning Perspectives, 26(2), 228–233.
- Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In C. Christ (Ed.), Demographic and economic change in developed countries (pp. 209–231). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Bitler, M., & Zavodny, M. (2001). The effect of abortion restrictions on the timing of abortions. Journal of Health Economics, 20(6), 1011–1032.
- Blank, R. M., George, C. C., & London, R. A. (1996). State abortion rates: The impact of policies, providers, politics, demographics, and economic environment. Journal of Health Economics, 15(5), 513–553.
- Brown, R., Jewell, R. T., & Rous, J. (2001). Provider availability, race and abortion demand. Southern Economic Journal, 67(63), 656–671.
- Cohen, J. E., & Barrilleaux, C. (1993). Public opinion, interest groups, and public policy making: Abortion policy in the American states. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 190–202). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Dennis, A., Henshaw, S. K., Joyce, T. J., Finer, L. B., & Blanchard, K. (2009). The impact of laws requiring parental involvement for abortion: A literature review. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
- Erikson, R. K., Wright, W. C., & McIver, J. P. (1993). Statehouse democracy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Goggin, M. L. (1993). A framework for understanding the new politics of abortion. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 1–18). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
-
Greene, W. H. (2000). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
10.1111/0002-9092.00010 Google Scholar
- Haas-Wilson, D. (1996). The impact of state abortion restrictions on minors' demand for abortions. Journal of Human Resources, 31(1), 140–158.
- Henshaw, S. K. (1995). Factors hindering access to abortion services. Family Planning Perspectives, 27(3), 54–59.
- Henshaw, S. K., Forrest, J. D., & Blaine, E. (1984). Abortion services in the United States, 1981 and 1982. Family Planning Perspectives, 16(3), 119–127.
- Henshaw, S. K., Joyce, T. J., Dennis, A., Finer, L. B., & Blanchard, K. (2009). Restrictions on Medicaid funding for abortions: A literature review. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
- Institute, G. (2006). State policies in brief. New York: Guttmacher Institute.
- Jewell, R. T., & Brown, R. W. (2000). An economic analysis of abortion: The effect of travel cost on teenagers. Social Science Journal, 37(1), 113–124.
- Jones, R. K., Zolna, M. R., Henshaw, S. K., & Finer, L. B. (2008). Abortion in the United States: Incidence and access to services, 2005. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health, 40(1), 6–16.
- Joyce, T., Henshaw, S. K., & Skatrud, J. D. (1997). The impact of Mississippi's mandatory delay law on abortions and births. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(8), 653–658.
- Joyce, T., Kaestner, R., & Colman, S. (2006). Changes in abortions and births and the Texas parental notification law. New England Journal of Medicine, 354(10), 1031–1038.
- Levine, P. B. (2003). Parental involvement laws and fertility behavior. Journal of Health Economics, 22(5), 861–878.
- Levine, P. B., Trainor, A. B., & Zimmerman, D. J. (1996). The effect of Medicaid abortion funding on abortions, pregnancies and births. Journal of Health Economics, 15(5), 555–578.
- Matthews, S., Ribar, D., & Wilhelm, M. (1997). The effects of economic conditions and access to reproductive health services on state abortion rates and birthrates. Family Planning Perspectives, 29(2), 52–60.
- Medoff, M. H. (1997). A pooled time-series analysis of abortion demand. Population Research and Policy Review, 16(6), 597–605.
- Medoff, M. H. (2002). The determinants and impact of state abortion restrictions. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 61(2), 481–494.
-
Medoff, M. H. (2007). Price, restrictions and abortion demand.
Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 28(4), 583–599.
10.1007/s10834-007-9080-9 Google Scholar
- Medoff, M. H. (2008). The response of abortion demand to changes in abortion cost. Social Indicators Research, 87(2), 329–346.
-
Medoff, M. H. (2009). The relationship between state abortion policies and abortion providers.
Gender Issues, 26(3/4), 224–237.
10.1007/s12147-009-9085-9 Google Scholar
- Merz, J. F., Jackson, C. A., & Klerman, J. A. (1995). A review of abortion policy: Legality, Medicaid funding and parental involvement, 1967–1994. Women's Rights Law Reporter, 17(1), 1–61.
- Michael, R. T. (1973). Education and the derived demand for children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), 128–164.
- NARAL. (2009). Who decides? The status of women's reproductive rights in the United States. Washington, DC: NARAL Foundation.
-
Norrander, B. (2001). State politics measuring state public opinion with the Senate National Election Study.
State Politics and Policy Quarterly, 1, 111–125.
10.1177/153244000100100107 Google Scholar
- Schnell, F. (1993). The foundations of abortion attitudes: The role of values and value conflict. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 23–41). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Statistical Abstract of the United States. (1983). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Statistical Abstract of the United States. (1993). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Statistical Abstract of the United States. (2000). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Statistical Abstract of the United States. (2003). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Statistical Abstract of the United States. (2006). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Census of the Population. (1983). State reports, detailed characteristics, 1980. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Census of the Population. (1993). State reports, detailed characteristics, 1990. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- U.S. Bureau of the Census, U.S. Census of the Population. (2003). State reports, detailed characteristics, 2000. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
- Wetstein, M. E. (1993). A LISREL model of public opinion on abortion. In M. L. Goggin (Ed.), Understanding the new politics of abortion (pp. 57–70). Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Wetstein, M. E. (1996). Abortion rates in the United States: The influence of opinion and policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
- Wilcox, C., & Riches, J. (2002). Pills in the public's mind: RU486 and the framing of the abortion issue. Women & Politics, 24(1), 61–80.
