Trans-System Social Ruptures: Exploring Issues of Vulnerability and Resiliency1
Abstract
This essay takes up a recently introduced term, trans-system social ruptures (TSSRs), and demonstrates its applicability to understanding ruptures to transnational systems. Using the relationship between Canada and the United States as a focus point, the article differentiates national from transnational system social ruptures. The article goes on to explore national and transnational system vulnerability to and resiliency from TSSRs. The distinction between the two types of TSSRs poses empirical, operational, and policy implications. The objective and subjective emergence of TSSRs as a social problem has much to offer to our understanding of disaster events and future crises. The article closes with several recommendations for theoretical development.
References
- Auf der Heide, E. (1989). Disaster response: Principles of preparation and coordination. St. Louis, MO: The C.V. Mosby Company.
- Boin, A. R., Groenleer, M. L. P., & Sundelius, B. (2007). Managing European emergencies: Considering the pros and cons of a European Union agency. Paper presented at the 4th ECPR General Conference, Pisa, Italy, September 6–8, 2007. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://www.essex.ac.uk/ecpr/events/generalconference/pisa/papers/PP746.pdf
- Clarke, S. E. (2002). Spatial concepts and cross border governance strategies: Comparing North American and Northern Europe experiences. Paper presented at The ERUA Conference on Urban and Spatial European Policies, April 18–20, Turin.
- Clifford, R. A. (1955). Informal group actions in the Rio Grande flood. A Report to the Committee on Disaster Studies, National Research Council.
- Clifford, R. A. (1956). The Rio Grande flood: A comparative study of border communities in disaster. Publication 458. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences, National Research Council.
- Corbacioglu, S., & Kapucu, N. (2006). Organisational learning and self adaptation in dynamic disaster environments. Disasters, 30(20), 212–233.
- Dynes, R. R. (2004). Expanding the horizons of disaster research. Natural Hazards Observer, 28(4), 1–3.
- Fritz, C. E., & Mathewson, J. H. (1957). Convergence behavior in disasters: A problem in social control. Washington, DC: Committee on Disaster Studies. Disaster Research Group.
- Gillespie, D. F. (1991). Coordinating community resources. In T. E. Drabek & G. J. Hoetmer (Eds.), Emergency management: Principles and practice for local government (pp. 55–78). Washington, DC: International City Management Association.
- Hallinan, M. T. (1997). The sociological study of social change. American Sociological Review, 62(February), 1–111.
- Hightower, H. C., & Coutu, M. (1996). Coordinating emergency management: A Canadian example. In R. T. Sylves & W. L. Waugh (Eds.), Disaster management in the U.S. and Canada: The politics, policymaking, administration and analysis of emergency management (pp. 69–98). Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
- Kendra, J. M., & Wachtendorf, T. (2003). Reconsidering convergence and converger legitimacy in response to the World Trade Center disaster. In L. Clarke (Ed.), Terrorism and disaster: New threats, new ideas research in social problems and public policy (Vol. 11, pp. 97–122). New York: Elsevier Science.
- Knoke, D., & Guilarte, M. (1994). Networks in organizational structures and strategies. Current Perspectives in Social Theory, 1(Suppl.), 77–115.
- Lagadec, P. (2000). Ruptures créatrices. Paris: Editions d'Organisation.
- Loseke, D. (2003). Thinking about social problems: An introduction to constructionist perspectives. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
-
Michaels, S. (1992). Issue networks and activism.
Policy Studies Review, 13(3/4), 241–258.
10.1111/j.1541-1338.1992.tb00471.x Google Scholar
- Michaels, S. (2005). Two cultures, one border: What Canadian and American values may mean for cross-border security cooperation. Invited presentation to Crossings: Workshop on Cross-Border Security Cooperation, The Institutes for Information Technology and Culture of Wayne State University, March 15, Detroit, MI.
- Norton, R. B. (2008). The prosperous and secure Delaware-Canada relationship. Notes for an address presented to the World Trade Center, March 4, Wilmington, DE, March 4.
- O'Brien, J. & Costa, R. (2006). American, Canadian mayors meet to discuss border security, Western Hemisphere Travel Initiative. U.S. Mayor Newspaper. The United States Conference of Mayors, August 7. Retrieved May 13, 2009, from http://www.usmayors.org/usmayornewspaper/documents/08_07_06/pg8_border_security.asp
- Perkmann, M. (2003). Cross-border regions in Europe: Significance and drivers of regional cross-border co-operation. European Urban and Regional Studies, 10(2), 153–171.
-
Perry, R. (2006). What is a disaster?
In
H. Rodriguez,
E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp.
1–15). New York: Springer.
10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_1 Google Scholar
- Quarantelli, E. L. (2008). Personal communication. March 17, 2008.
-
Quarantelli, E. L.,
Lagadec, P., & Boin, A. (2006). A heuristic approach to future disasters and crisis. In
H. Rodriguez,
E. L. Quarantelli, & R. R. Dynes (Eds.), Handbook of disaster research (pp.
16–41). New York: Springer.
10.1007/978-0-387-32353-4_2 Google Scholar
- Rosenthal, U. (1990). Cross-national approaches to disasters and disaster research. Paper prepared for the Research Committee on Disasters, World Congress of Sociology, Madrid, July 9–13, 1990.
-
Rosenthal, U., & ‘t Hart, P. (1998). Flood response and crisis management in Western Europe: A comparative analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
10.1007/978-3-642-71997-4 Google Scholar
- Scanlon, T. J. (1994). The role of EOCs in emergency management: A comparison of American and Canadian experience. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 12(1), 51–75.
- Scanlon, T. J. (2003). Helping the other victims of September 11: Gander uses multiple EOCs to deal with 3 diverted flights. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 18(2), 108–121.
- The U.S. Embassy. (2008). The embassy of the U.S.A., Ottawa—United States Canada relations. Retrieved March 17, 2008, from http://canada.usembassy.gov/content/textonly.asp?section=can_usa&document=trade
- U.S. Department of Transportation. (2004). Effects of catastrophic events on transportation system management and operations: August 2003 Northeast blackout Great Lakes region. Final Report DOT-VNTSC-FHWA-04-02. 1.
- Wachtendorf, T. (1999). A river runs through it: Cross border interaction during the 1997 Red River flood. Thesis #11. Newark: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
- Wachtendorf, T. (2000a). When disasters defy borders: What we can learn from the Red River flood about transnational disasters. The Australian Journal of Emergency Management, 15(3), 36–41.
- Wachtendorf, T. (2000b). Interaction between Canadian and American governmental and non governmental organizations during the Red River flood of 1997. Report Submitted to the International Joint Commission Ottawa/Washington. Newark: Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware.
