Private Governments and Private Services: Homeowners Associations in the City and Behind the Gate
Abstract
In this article, we examine homeowners associations (HOAs) as private providers of what are traditionally considered local government services: streets, security, recreation, maintenance, and public works (e.g., water, drainage, sewerage, and trash collection). Although much has been theorized about the nature of such organizations, little empirical data has been collected to examine these prescriptions. We present the results of a 2005 survey of large-scale HOAs to shed light on the characteristics of such associations, and especially the nature of their relationships with local governments that may be providing similar services. We find that the survey raises interesting questions about how these associations interact with local governments, and that the nature of private as opposed to public governance demands further study.
References
- Altshuler, A. A., & Gomez-Ibanez, J. A. (1993). Regulation for revenue: The political economy of land use exactions. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution/Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
- Bayley, D. H., & Shearing, C. D. (1996). The future of policing. Law & Society Review, 30, 585–606.
-
Ben-Joseph, E. (2004). Double standards, single goal: Private communities and design innovation.
Journal of Urban Design, 9, 131–151.
10.1080/1357480042000227799 Google Scholar
- Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
- Bish, R. L., & Ostrom, V. (1973). Understanding urban government: Metropolitan reform reconsidered. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
- Blakely, E., & Snyder, M. G. (1997). Fortress America: Gated communities in the United States. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
- Boudreaux, D. J., & Holcombe, R. G. (2002). Contractual governments in theory and practice. In D. T. Beito, P. Gordon, & A. Tabarrok (Eds.), The voluntary city. Ann Arbor, MI: The Independent Institute.
- Cheung, R. (2006). The interaction between public and private governments: An empirical analysis.Unpublished paper. Retrieved April 23, 2006, from http://mailer.fsu.edu/~rcheung/index_files/research.htm
- Clingermayer, J., & Feiock, R. C. (1997). Leadership turnover, transaction costs, and external city service delivery. Public Administration Review, 57, 231–239.
- Community Associations Institute. (2006). Industry data. In Data on U.S. Community Associations. Retrieved September 7, 2006, from http://www.caionline.org/about/facts.cfm
- Dilger, R. J. (1992). Neighborhood politics: Residential community associations in American governance. New York: New York University Press.
- Dilger, R. J., Moffett, R. R., & Struyk, L. (1997). Privatization of municipal services in America's largest cities. Public Administration Review, 57, 21–27.
- Dillman, D. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley.
- Ferris, J., & Graddy, E. (1986). Contracting out: For what? With whom? Public Administration Review, 46, 343–344.
- Foldvary, F. (1994). Public goods and private communities. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.
- Frug, G. E. (1980). The city as a legal concept. Harvard Law Review, 93, 1059–1154.
- Gordon, T. M. (2004). Moving up by moving out? Planned developments and residential segregation in California. Urban Studies, 41, 441–461.
- Hyatt, W. S. (1985). Condominiums and homeowner associations: A guide to the development process. Colorado Springs, CO: Shepard's/McGraw-Hill.
- Hyatt, W. S. (2000). Condominium and homeowner association practice: Community association law ( 3rd ed.). Philadelphia: American Law Institute-American Bar Association.
- Joassart-Marcelli, P., & Musso, J. (2005). Municipal service provision choices within a metropolitan area. Urban Affairs Review, 40, 492–519.
- Krane, D., Rigos, P. N., & Hill, M. B., Jr. (2001). Home rule in America. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
- Langbein, L., & Spotswood-Bright, K. (2004). Efficiency, accountability, and private government: The impact of residential community associations on residential property values. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 640–659.
- Levine, C. H. (1984). Citizenship and service delivery: The promise of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 44, 178–187.
- McCabe, B. C. (2005). The rules are different here: An institutional comparison of cities and homeowners associations. Administration & Society, 37, 404–425
- McKenzie, E. (1994). Privatopia. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- McKenzie, E. (2005). Construction the Pomerium in Las Vegas: A case study of emerging trends in American gated communities. Housing Studies, 20, 187–203.
- Miller, G. J. (1981). Cities by contract. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Natelson, R. G. (1989). Law of property owners associations. Boston: Little, Brown & Co.
- Nelson, R. (2005). Private neighborhoods and the transformation of local government. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
- Noonan, D. S. (2005). Neighbors, barriers and urban environments: Are things ‘different on the other side of the tracks’? Urban Studies, 42, 1817–1835.
- Oakerson, R. J. (1989). Residential community associations: Further differentiating the organization of local public economies. In U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Residential community associations: Private governments in the intergovernmental system? (pp. 105–110). Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
- Stein, R. M. (1990). Urban alternatives. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
- Sterk, S. E. (1997). Minority protection in residential private governments. Boston University Law Review, 77, 273–342.
- Tabarrok, A. (2002). Market challenges and government failure. In D. T. Beito, P. Gordon, & A. Tabarrok (Eds.), The voluntary city (pp. 405–433). Ann Arbor, MI: The Independent Institute.
- Tarlock, A. D. (1989). Residential community associations and land use controls. In U.S. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Residential community associations: Private governments in the intergovernmental system? (pp. 75–83). Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
- U.S. Advisory Commission On Intergovernmental Relations. (1989). Residential community associations: Private governments in the intergovernmental system? Washington, DC: Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations.
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2002). Census of governments. Washington, DC: Author.
- Warner, M., & Hebdon, R. (2001). Local government restructuring: Privatization and its alternatives. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 20(2), 315–336.
- Wilson-Doenges, G. (2000). An exploration of sense of community and fear of crime in gated communities. Environment and Behavior, 32, 597–611.