Volume 26, Issue 4 pp. 465-468

Patent Foramen Ovale Not So Patent

José López-Haldón M.D.

José López-Haldón M.D.

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Francisco López-Pardo M.D.

Francisco López-Pardo M.D.

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
María J. Rodríguez-Puras M.D.

María J. Rodríguez-Puras M.D.

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ángel Martínez-Martínez M.D.

Ángel Martínez-Martínez M.D.

Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 April 2009
Citations: 2
Address for correspondence and reprint requests: José López-Haldón, M.D., Servicio de Cardiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Avenida Manuel Siurot s/n, 41013, Sevilla, Spain. Fax: +34955012330; E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with agitated saline contrast is the most sensitive tool for diagnosing patent foramen ovale (PFO), but false positives can result. We report a patient who underwent a TEE during the study of a cryptogenic stroke. Contrast appeared in the left atrium with the Valsalva maneuver. However, the contrast exit site was not identified, and contrast continued to appear with Valsalva once the saline microbubbles had disappeared. Combined with the contrast characteristics, this suggested a spontaneous contrast phenomenon rather than a PFO. This phenomenon must be kept in mind to avoid overdiagnosing PFO.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.