Volume 53, Issue 1 pp. 211-220
HEMAPHERESIStitle

Donor safety in triple plateletpheresis: results from the German and Austrian Plateletpheresis Study Group multicenter trial

Hans-Gert Heuft

Corresponding Author

Hans-Gert Heuft

From the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; the Hospital Laboratory Network Brandenburg-Berlin, Bernau, Germany; Aix Scientifics, Clinical Research Organisation, Aachen, Germany; and the Department for Transfusion Medicine& Hemostaseology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Hans-Gert Heuft, Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl Neuberg Strasse 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Rainer Moog

Rainer Moog

From the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; the Hospital Laboratory Network Brandenburg-Berlin, Bernau, Germany; Aix Scientifics, Clinical Research Organisation, Aachen, Germany; and the Department for Transfusion Medicine& Hemostaseology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
Eike G. Fischer

Eike G. Fischer

From the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; the Hospital Laboratory Network Brandenburg-Berlin, Bernau, Germany; Aix Scientifics, Clinical Research Organisation, Aachen, Germany; and the Department for Transfusion Medicine& Hemostaseology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
Jürgen Zingsem

Jürgen Zingsem

From the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; the Hospital Laboratory Network Brandenburg-Berlin, Bernau, Germany; Aix Scientifics, Clinical Research Organisation, Aachen, Germany; and the Department for Transfusion Medicine& Hemostaseology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
German and Austrian Plateletpheresis Study Group

German and Austrian Plateletpheresis Study Group

From the Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany; the Hospital Laboratory Network Brandenburg-Berlin, Bernau, Germany; Aix Scientifics, Clinical Research Organisation, Aachen, Germany; and the Department for Transfusion Medicine& Hemostaseology, University Hospital Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 May 2012
Citations: 15

The study was financed by grants from Baxter Deutschland GmbH, Unterschleißheim, Germany; Fresenius Transfusions GmbH, Friedberg, Germany; Gambro BCT, Zaventem, Belgium; and Haemonetics Deutschland GmbH, Munich, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective was to investigate potential risks for apheresis donors associated with a triple-plateletpheresis (TP) program.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Eleven hemapheresis centers randomly assigned 411 repeat donors (ratio, 1:1.2) to either double plateletpheresis (DP; 185 donors) or TP (226 donors) with a platelet (PLT) target content of at least 5.0 × 1011 PLTs/DP and at least 7.5 × 1011 PLTs/TP. The primary endpoint was procedure-related postapheresis PLT count of at least 150 × 109/L (probability, ≥98%). Secondary endpoints were apheresis characteristics and donor adverse reactions.

RESULTS: In 6 of 1133 DPs (0.5%) in 4 of 185 donors (2.2%) and in 20 of 1020 TPs (2.0%) in 14 of 226 donors (6.2%), postapheresis PLT counts were below 150 × 109/L. There were marginal but significant differences in collection efficiency (DP, 69.2 ± 9.1%; TP, 70.9 ± 9.0%; p ≤ 0.0001) and collection rate (DP, 10.4 × 109 ± 2.3 × 109 PLTs/min; TP, 10.8 × 109 ± 2.3 × 109 PLTs/min; p ≤ 0.005). The PLT yields were 5.9 × 1011 ± 0.8 × 1011 PLTs for DP and 8.3 × 1011 ± 0.9 × 1011 PLT for TP (p ≤ 0.0001) at processing times of 59 ± 13 minutes (DP) versus 80 ± 16 minutes (TP; p ≤ 0.0001). Significant PLT recruitment (1.10 ± 0.14 vs. 1.20 ± 0.23; p < 0.0001) was seen for both DP and TP. DP and TP did not differ with regard to venous access problems (VAPs) without discontinuation (3.8% for both), but DP induced fewer VAPs with discontinuation (1.1% vs. 3.0%; p < 0.01). Mild citrate toxicity (1.7% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.01) and circulatory reactions (0.4% vs. 2.2%; p < 0.01) were more often noticed in TP, but caused no increase in discontinuations.

CONCLUSIONS: TP results in an increase in mild donor reactions but does not significantly impair donor safety or product quality.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.