Volume 50, Issue 8 pp. 1722-1730
TRANSFUSION COMPLICATION

Transfusion premedication to prevent acute transfusion reactions: a retrospective observational study to assess current practices

Jessica L. Fry

Jessica L. Fry

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Donald M. Arnold

Donald M. Arnold

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine M. Clase

Catherine M. Clase

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Mark A. Crowther

Mark A. Crowther

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Anne M. Holbrook

Anne M. Holbrook

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Aicha N. Traore

Aicha N. Traore

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Theodore E. Warkentin

Theodore E. Warkentin

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
Nancy M. Heddle

Nancy M. Heddle

From the Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, the Department of Medicine, and the Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University; and Canadian Blood Services, Research and Development, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 August 2010
Citations: 29
Nancy Heddle, MSc, FCSMLS(D), Director, McMaster Transfusion Research Program, Associate Professor, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, 1200 Main Street W, HSC-3N43, Hamilton, ON L8N 3Z5; e-mail: [email protected].

This project was supported with a Frederick Banting and Charles Best Canada Graduate Scholarship (Master's Award) from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and infrastructure grant support from Canadian Blood Services.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of premedication to prevent acute transfusion reactions has been estimated to occur in 50% to 80% of transfusions. While this practice has some biologic rationale, few clinical studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of this practice, and the methodologic quality of these studies is variable. The primary objective of this study was to describe current practices regarding transfusion premedication to prevent febrile nonhemolytic transfusion reactions, mild allergic transfusion reactions, and transfusion-associated circulatory overload.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted an observational retrospective chart review of a stratified random sample of 324 transfusions that took place over a 6-month period. Data were abstracted from medical records and then scanned into a database for analysis. We calculated inter- and intraobserver agreement on key abstracted data to estimate assessment error. A two-phase adjudication process was used to determine whether or not medications given before the time of each transfusion were intended as premedications.

RESULTS: Of the transfusions sampled, 1.6% (95% confidence interval, 0.4-3.9) were associated with premedication medications to prevent an acute transfusion reaction. Inter- and intraobserver reliability in the abstraction of key data points was good. Good agreement in adjudicator classification of outcomes was achieved only when adjudicators were provided with patient source documents.

CONCLUSIONS: Premedication use was infrequent and much less common than previously reported. Improved methods of capturing transfusion premedication, which likely require prospective assessments, are needed for future research studies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.