Volume 50, Issue 11 pp. 2377-2389

Neurocognitive effects of adjunctive levetiracetam in children with partial-onset seizures: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority trial

Paul M. Levisohn

Paul M. Levisohn

Department of Pediatric Neurology, Children’s Hospital, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Mintz

Mark Mintz

The Center for Neurological and Neurodevelopmental Health and the Clinical Research Center of New Jersey, Voorhees, New Jersey, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Scott J. Hunter

Scott J. Hunter

University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
Haichen Yang

Haichen Yang

UCB, Inc., Smyrna, Georgia, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
John Jones

John Jones

UCB, Inc., Smyrna, Georgia, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
on behalf of the N01103 Levetiracetam Study Group

on behalf of the N01103 Levetiracetam Study Group

Department of Pediatric Neurology, Children’s Hospital, Denver, Colorado, U.S.A.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 October 2009
Citations: 81
Address correspondence to Paul M. Levisohn, M.D., Associate Professor of Pediatrics and Neurology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, The Children’s Hospital, 13123 East 16th Avenue, B 155, Aurora, CO 80045, U.S.A. E-mail [email protected]

Summary

Purpose: Evaluate potential neurocognitive effects of adjunctive levetiracetam in children with inadequately controlled partial-onset seizures (POS).

Methods: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, noninferiority safety study. Children (4–16 years; IQ ≥65) with ≥1 POS during 4 weeks before screening despite taking 1–2 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were randomized (2:1) to levetiracetam (20–60 mg/kg/day) or placebo for 12 weeks.

Results: Ninety-nine patients were randomized with 98 (levetiracetam 64, placebo 34) in intent-to-treat (ITT) and 73 (levetiracetam 46, placebo 27) in per protocol (PP) populations. Primary cognitive assessment was the Leiter International Performance Scale–Revised Attention and Memory Battery with the memory screen composite score change from baseline as the primary endpoint. PP Least Square Mean [LSM (standard error)] were 5.36 (1.78) for levetiracetam; 5.17 (2.33) for placebo; difference [two-sided 90% confidence interval (CI)] 0.19 (−4.69, 5.08). Levetiracetam was noninferior to placebo because the 90% CI lower bound was greater than the defined noninferiority margin (−9.0). There were no statistically significant differences between groups in Wide Range Assessment of Memory and Learning-2 indexes and Leiter-R Examiner’s Rating Scale scores. Median reductions from baseline in weekly POS frequency were 91.5% versus 26.5% for levetiracetam versus placebo; ≥50% responder rates: 62.5% versus 41.2%; seizure freedom rates: 46.9% versus 8.8% (ITT). Adverse events were reported by 89.1% levetiracetam-treated and 85.3% placebo-treated patients; those reported by ≥10% levetiracetam patients and more often with levetiracetam were headache, nasopharyngitis, fatigue, vomiting, somnolence, and aggression.

Discussion: Neurocognitive effects were no different in pediatric patients with POS treated with adjunctive levetiracetam or placebo. Levetiracetam was effective and well tolerated.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me