Volume 50, Issue 11 pp. 2362-2368

Stiripentol open study in Japanese patients with Dravet syndrome

Yushi Inoue

Yushi Inoue

Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yoko Ohtsuka

Yoko Ohtsuka

Department of Child Neurology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hirokazu Oguni

Hirokazu Oguni

Department of Pediatrics, Tokyo Women’s Medical University, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Jun Tohyama

Jun Tohyama

Nishi-Niigata Chuo National Hospital, Niigata, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroshi Baba

Hiroshi Baba

Nagasaki Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Katsuyuki Fukushima

Katsuyuki Fukushima

Yakumo Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hideyuki Ohtani

Hideyuki Ohtani

Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Yukitoshi Takahashi

Yukitoshi Takahashi

Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Shizuoka, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Shunya Ikeda

Shunya Ikeda

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 October 2009
Citations: 87
Address correspondence to Dr. Yushi Inoue, National Epilepsy Center, Shizuoka Institute of Epilepsy and Neurological Disorders, Urushiyama 886, Aoi-ku, Shizuoka 420-8688, Japan. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

Purpose: To survey the treatment situation of Dravet syndrome in Japan and to compare this result with effectiveness of stiripentol (STP) add-on therapy in an open-label multicenter study.

Methods: Medical records of patients with Dravet syndrome who visited the study institutions during 2006 were surveyed to examine the effect of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on clonic or tonic–clonic seizures (GTCS). Patients older than 1 year of age treated with at least one conventional AED and more than four GTCS per month were invited to participate in the STP study. Seizure status and adverse effects during the first 4 weeks of STP (50 or 1,000 mg/day) add-on therapy (early period) and during long-term treatment were compared with baseline.

Results: Only 15% of the treatment trials with 15 conventional AEDs in 112 patients succeeded in reducing seizures by more than 50%. With STP, GTCS were reduced more than 50% in 14 of 23 patients (61%), including 2 who became seizure-free, in the early period. Moreover, duration of seizures was shortened in 10 patients and status epilepticus decreased in 6. These effects continued in the long-term although to a lesser degree. Adverse effects (loss of appetite, sleep disturbance, ataxia, hyperactivity/irritability) disappeared after dose modification in most cases. STP was effective at a lower than initial dose in five patients. Some patients benefited from STP added on clobazam despite mutation in CYP2C19.

Conclusion: Our data suggest that an early introduction of STP into Japan will result in substantial patient benefit.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.

click me