Volume 19, Issue 3 pp. 250-256

Sedation medication received and adverse events related to sedation for brain MRI in children with and without developmental disabilities

NIRUPAMA KANNIKESWARAN MD

NIRUPAMA KANNIKESWARAN MD

*Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University

Search for more papers by this author
PRASHANT V. MAHAJAN MD MPH MBA

PRASHANT V. MAHAJAN MD MPH MBA

*Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University

Search for more papers by this author
USHA SETHURAMAN MD

USHA SETHURAMAN MD

*Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University

Search for more papers by this author
ANNA GROEBE MD

ANNA GROEBE MD

†Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Michigan and

Search for more papers by this author
XINGUANG CHEN MD PhD

XINGUANG CHEN MD PhD

‡Department of Pediatrics, Wayne State University, Beaubien Blvd, Detroit, MI, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 February 2009
Citations: 72
Dr Nirupama Kannikeswaran, MD, Assistant Professor of Pediatrics, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Division of Emergency Medicine, Children’s Hospital of Michigan, Wayne State University, 3901, Beaubien Blvd, Detroit, MI 48201, USA (email: [email protected]).

Summary

Background: There are few studies on sedation medication requirements and sedation related adverse events in developmentally disabled children.

Objectives: The objectives of our study were to compare sedation medication received and sedation related adverse events for brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) between children with and without developmental disabilities. We hypothesized that developmentally disabled children would require increased doses of sedative medications and will have increased frequency of adverse events when compared with normal children.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective chart review on children 1–18 years, who required sedation for an elective brain MRI. Children were excluded if they required sedation for diagnostic imaging other than brain MRI, belonged to ASA category >3, or required general anesthesia. Data on developmental status, demographics and details of sedation medications received along with adverse events were collected.

Results: About 53.5% (260/486) of the patients were classified as developmentally disabled. Pentobarbital and fentanyl were the two most common medications used for sedation in children with and without developmental disability. There was no difference in the mean dosages of pentobarbital (3.02 mg·kg−1 vs 3.06 mg·kg−1; P = 0.2) and fentanyl (1.01 mcg·kg−1 vs 1.02 mcg·kg−1; P = 0.81) in the two groups. There was a threefold increased incidence of hypoxia noted in children with developmental disability (11.9% vs 4.9%; P < 0.01). Presence of developmental disability alone was significantly associated with sedation related hypoxia (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.8, 6.94; P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Children with developmental disabilities have similar requirements for sedation medications but are three times more likely to experience hypoxia when compared with normal children.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.