Bibliometric awareness in nursing scholarship: Can we afford to ignore it any longer?
Corresponding Author
Derek R. Smith BSC, BED, MHSC, MPH, MSC, PhD, DRMEDSC, FSIA, FACTM, FRSPH, CPE
School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah
Derek R. Smith, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, The University of Newcastle, Brush Road, Ourimbah, New South Wales 2258, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMichael Hazelton RN, BA, MA, PhD, FACMHN
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Derek R. Smith BSC, BED, MHSC, MPH, MSC, PhD, DRMEDSC, FSIA, FACTM, FRSPH, CPE
School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Ourimbah
Derek R. Smith, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Health, The University of Newcastle, Brush Road, Ourimbah, New South Wales 2258, Australia. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorMichael Hazelton RN, BA, MA, PhD, FACMHN
School of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In contemporary nursing academia, it is unthinkable that topics such as research methods, evidence-based practice, and the translation of research into practice would be omitted from nursing curricula at any level. What is surprising, however, is that despite a broad educational emphasis on “teaching research”, the rising importance of bibliometrics appears to have been largely neglected. If nursing scholarship and nursing scholars are to prosper in the highly competitive field of modern health research, a sophisticated understanding of citation-based methods is clearly required. Armed with this knowledge, one can more successfully argue why scarce research funding, that might otherwise be channeled elsewhere, ought to be assigned to nursing researchers. We hereby urge readers to reflect on the extent to which bibliometrics is covered within formal nursing curricula at their college or university. It is no longer a case of if a graduate nurse will need this skill set for their future professional development, but when.
REFERENCES
- ARC. 2011. Australian Research Council Website. ERA 2010 National Report, Section 3: National Profiles by Field of Research Code, [Cited 4 Nov 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/ERA_s3.pdf.
- Carney M. Commentary on Cecil R, Thompson K & Parahoo K (2006), The research assessment exercise in nursing: learning from the past, looking to the future. J. Clin. Nurs. 2007; 15: 395–402. J Clin Nurs, 16, 1378–1380; discussion 1380–1371.
- Cecil R, Thompson K, Parahoo K. The research assessment exercise in nursing: learning from the past, looking to the future. J. Clin. Nurs. 2006; 15: 395–402.
- Crookes PA, Reis SL, Jones SC. The development of a ranking tool for refereed journals in which nursing and midwifery researchers publish their work. Nurse Educ. Today 2010; 30: 420–427.
- Garfield E. Journal Citation Studies. 44. Citation patterns in nursing journals, and their most-cited articles. Essays Inf. Sci. 1984; 7: 336–345.
- Guidotti TL. AEOH and the literature of environmental and occupational health. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2009; 64 (Suppl.): 1–3.
- Hack TF, Crooks D, Plohman J, Kepron E. Research citation analysis of nursing academics in Canada: identifying success indicators. J. Adv. Nurs. 2010; 66: 2542–2549.
- Hallberg IR. Moving nursing research forward towards a stronger impact on health care practice? Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2009; 46: 407–412.
- Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2005; 102: 16569–16572.
- Hunt GE, Cleary M. Quality is better than quantity when it comes to publications. J. Clin. Nurs. 2010; 20: 70–72.
- Johnstone MJ. Journal impact factors: implications for the nursing profession. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2007; 54: 35–40.
- Ketefian S, Dai YT. Environment for nursing scholarship and journal impact factors in Taiwan. Nurs. Health Sci. 2010; 12: 191–197.
- Ketefian S, Dai YT, Hanucharurnkul S, Mendes IA, Norman IJ. Environments for nursing scholarship and journal impact factor in five countries. Int. Nurs. Rev. 2010; 57: 343–351.
- Lehmann S, Jackson AD, Lautrup BE. Measures for measures. Nature 2006; 444: 1003–1004.
- Lewallen LP, Crane PB. Choosing a publication venue. J. Prof. Nurs. 2010; 26: 250–254.
- Mantzoukas S. The research evidence published in high impact nursing journals between 2000 and 2006: a quantitative content analysis. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2009; 46: 479–489.
- Melby CS. Examining the future of professional journals. Nurs. Health Sci. 2005; 7: 219–220.
- Oermann MH, Blair DA, Kowalewski K, Wilmes NA, Nordstrom CK. Citation analysis of the maternal/child nursing literature. Pediatr. Nurs. 2007; 33: 387–391.
- Oermann MH, Nordstrom CK, Wilmes NA et al. Information sources for developing the nursing literature. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2008; 45: 580–587.
- Oermann MH, Shaw-Kokot J, Knafl GJ, Dowell J. Dissemination of research into clinical nursing literature. J. Clin. Nurs. 2010; 19: 3435–3442.
- Polit DF, Beck CT. International differences in nursing research, 2005–2006. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2009; 41: 44–53.
- Polit DF, Northam S. Publication opportunities in nonnursing journals. Nurse Educ. 2010; 35: 237–242.
- Polit DF, Northam S. Impact factors in nursing journals. Nurs. Outlook 2011; 59: 18–28.
- SCImago Journal & Country Rank Website. [Cited 4 Nov 2011.] Available from URL: http://www.scimagojr.com/index.php.
- Shams ML, Dixon LS. Mapping selected general literature of international nursing. J. Med. Libr. Assoc. 2007; 95: e1–e5.
- Smith DR. Citation analysis and impact factor trends of 5 core journals in occupational medicine, 1985–2006. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2008; 63: 114–122.
- Smith DR. Identifying a set of “core” journals in occupational health, part 1: lists proposed by others. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2010a; 65: 106–110.
- Smith DR. Identifying a set of “core” journals in occupational health, part 2: lists derived by bibliometric techniques. Arch. Environ. Occup. Health 2010b; 65: 173–175.
- Smith DR. A longitudinal analysis of bibliometric and impact factor trends among the core international journals of nursing, 1977–2008. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2010c; 47: 1491–1499.
- Smith DR, Hazelton M. Bibliometrics, citation indexing, and the journals of nursing. Nurs. Health Sci. 2008; 10: 260–265.
- Thompson DR, Watson R. Rating research performance. J. Clin. Nurs. 2009; 18: 2781–2782.
- Thompson DR, Watson R. h-Indices and the performance of professors of nursing in the UK. J. Clin. Nurs. 2010; 19: 2957–2958.
- Turale S. Progress in scholarly journal publications. Nurs. Health Sci. 2010; 12: 399.
- Turale S, Ito M, Murakami K, Nakao F. Nursing scholarship in Japan: development, facilitators, and barriers. Nurs. Health Sci. 2009; 11: 166–173.