Volume 10, Issue 5 pp. 446-452

WHO class-specific equations using height2 for predicting body weight: Crude indicator for dry weight in haemodialysis patients

SEOUNG WOO LEE

SEOUNG WOO LEE

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Disease Research Group, Inha University College of Medicine, Inchon, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
GEUN HO PARK

GEUN HO PARK

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Disease Research Group, Inha University College of Medicine, Inchon, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
SUN YOUNG LEE

SUN YOUNG LEE

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Disease Research Group, Inha University College of Medicine, Inchon, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
JOON HO SONG

JOON HO SONG

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Disease Research Group, Inha University College of Medicine, Inchon, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
MOON-JAE KIM

Corresponding Author

MOON-JAE KIM

Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Disease Research Group, Inha University College of Medicine, Inchon, Korea

Dr Moon-Jae Kim, Director, Kidney Center, Inha University Hospital, 7-206, 3-Ga, Sinhung-Dong, Jung-Gu, Inchon city, Republic of Korea. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 October 2005
Citations: 1

SUMMARY:

Aim:  Body weight (BW) might be related to total body water, and the difference between a patient's actual BW and ideal BW (IBW) might be the volume marker. However, there has been no information about the association between IBW and dry weight (DW) in haemodialysis (HD) patients.

Methods:  First, we analysed the relationship between DW and IBW in 51 HD patients. The IBW was calculated by 21 × Height (Ht)2. Weight status was analysed by the WHO classification. Second, in 12 436 controls, linear equations using Ht2 were sought to predict the BW in each sex and WHO class. Third, using these equations, predicted BW (PW) was compared with DW in each WHO class at the initiation and after 1 year in 619 new HD patients, retrospectively.

Results:  Among 51 HD patients, 38 were normal weight in whom there was no difference between DW and IBW. In each sex and WHO class of the 12 436 controls, linear equations using Ht2 were developed to predict BW. These equations were applied to 619 new HD patients. In males, there were no differences between PW and DW in underweight (UW), overweight (OW), obese (OB) and extremely obese (EOB) patients at the initiation of the HD. In females, there were no differences between PW and DW in OW patients. Despite no statistical differences, there were wide ranges of distribution from −6 to 6 kg between PW and DW.

Conclusions:  BW had a linear relationship with Ht2 and might be predictable by the WHO class-specific equation using Ht2. These equations might be useful as a crude indicator of DW in HD patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.