Volume 25, Issue 4 pp. 719-724

Natural history of gallstone disease: Expectant management or active treatment? Results from a population-based cohort study

Davide Festi

Corresponding Author

Davide Festi

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and

Professor Davide Festi, Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica, Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi, Via Massarenti 9, 40138 Bologna, Italy. Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani

Maria Letizia Bacchi Reggiani

Department of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy,

Search for more papers by this author
Adolfo F. Attili

Adolfo F. Attili

Department of Gastroenterology, University ‘La Sapienza’, Rome, Italy,

Search for more papers by this author
Paola Loria

Paola Loria

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Modena, Modena, Italy,

Search for more papers by this author
Paolo Pazzi

Paolo Pazzi

Department of Internal Medicine, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy,

Search for more papers by this author
Eleonora Scaioli

Eleonora Scaioli

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and

Search for more papers by this author
Simona Capodicasa

Simona Capodicasa

Department of Medicine and Aging, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Ferdinando Romano

Ferdinando Romano

Department of Medicine and Aging, University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Enrico Roda

Enrico Roda

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and

Search for more papers by this author
Antonio Colecchia

Antonio Colecchia

Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 March 2010
Citations: 135

Abstract

Background and Aims: The knowledge of natural history is essential for disease management. We evaluated the natural history (e.g. frequency and characteristics of symptoms and clinical outcome) of gallstones (GS) in a population-based cohort study.

Methods: A total of 11 229 subjects (6610 men, 4619 women, age-range: 29–69 years, mean age: 48 years) were studied. At ultrasonography, GS were present in 856 subjects (338 men, 455 women) (7.1%). GS were followed by means of a questionnaire inquiring about the characteristics of specific biliary symptoms.

Results: At enrolment, 580 (73.1%) patients were asymptomatic, 94 (11.8%) had mild symptoms and 119 (15.1%) had severe symptoms. GS patients were followed up for a mean period of 8.7 years; 63 subjects (7.3%) were lost to follow up. At the end of the follow up, of the asymptomatic subjects, 453 (78.1%) remained asymptomatic; 61 (10.5%) developed mild symptoms and 66 (11.4%) developed severe symptoms. In subjects with mild symptoms, the symptoms disappeared in 55 (58.5%), became severe in 23 (24.5%), remained stable in 16 (17%); in subjects with severe symptoms, the symptoms disappeared in 62 (52.1%), became mild in 20 (16.8%) and remained stable in 37 (31.1%). A total of 189 cholecystectomies were performed: 41.3% on asymptomatic patients, 17.4% on patients with mild symptoms and 41.3% on patients with severe symptoms.

Conclusions: This study indicates that: (i) asymptomatic and symptomatic GS patients have a benign natural history; (ii) the majority of GS patients with severe or mild symptoms will no longer experience biliary pain; and (iii) a significant proportion of cholecystectomies are performed in asymptomatic patients. Expectant management still represents a valid therapeutic approach in the majority of patients.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.