Volume 25, Issue 2 pp. 185-190

Assessing elements of informed consent among living donors

M. Valapour

M. Valapour

Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota

Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
J.P. Kahn

J.P. Kahn

Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota

Search for more papers by this author
R.F. Bailey

R.F. Bailey

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
A.J. Matas

A.J. Matas

Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 December 2010
Citations: 55
Corresponding author: Maryam Valapour, MD, Center for Bioethics, University of Minnesota, N504 Boynton, 410 Church St. SE, Minneapolis, MN 55416, USA.
Tel.: 612 624 9440; fax: 612 624 9108;
e-mail: [email protected]

Conflict of interest: None.

Abstract

Valapour M, Kahn JP, Bailey RF, Matas AJ. Assessing elements of informed consent among living donors.
Clin Transplant 2011: 25: 185–190. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S.

Abstract: Living organ donors – 50% of solid organ donors in the United States – represent a unique population who accept medical risk for the benefit of another. One of the main justifications for this practice has been respect for donor autonomy, as realized through informed consent. In this retrospective study of living donors, we investigate two key criteria of informed consent: (i) depth of understanding and (ii) degree of voluntariness. In our survey of 262 living kidney donors 2–40 months post-donation, we found that more than 90% understood the effects of living donation on recipient outcomes, the screening process, and the short-term medical risks of donation. In contrast, only 69% understood the psychological risks of donation; 52% the long-term medical risks of donation; and 32% the financial risks of donation. Understanding the effects of living donation on recipient outcomes was the only factor that would affect donors’ decision to donate again. A total of 40% of donors reported feeling some pressure to donate. Donors who are related to the recipient were more likely to report feeling pressure to donate. We conclude that more studies of informed consent are needed to identify factors that may compromise the validity of informed consent.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.