Volume 66, Issue 10 pp. 1345-1359
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force report on ‘dose–response relationship in allergen-specific immunotherapy’

M. A. Calderón

M. A. Calderón

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
D. Larenas

D. Larenas

Hospital Médica Sur, Mexico City, Mexico

Search for more papers by this author
J. Kleine-Tebbe

J. Kleine-Tebbe

Allergy & Asthma Center Westend, Berlin, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
L. Jacobsen

L. Jacobsen

Research Centre for Prevention and Health, Glostrup University Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
G. Passalacqua

G. Passalacqua

Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, DIMI, Department of Internal Medicine, Genoa, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
P. A. Eng

P. A. Eng

Section of Allergy and Pulmonology, Children’s Hospital Aarau and Lucerne, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
E. M. Varga

E. M. Varga

Department of Paediatrics, Respiratory and Allergic Disease Division, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
E. Valovirta

E. Valovirta

Suomen Terveystalo Allergy Clinic, Turku, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
C. Moreno

C. Moreno

Seccion de Alergia, Hospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
H. J. Malling

H. J. Malling

Allergy Unit, University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
E. Alvarez-Cuesta

E. Alvarez-Cuesta

Allergy Division, Ramon & Cajal University Hospital, Alcala de Henares University, Madrid, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
S. Durham

S. Durham

National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
P. Demoly

P. Demoly

University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 June 2011
Citations: 83
Moisés A. Calderón, Section of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Royal Brompton Hospital, London, UK.
Tel.: +44 20 73518024
Fax: +44 20 73497780
E-mail: [email protected]

Edited by: Michael Wechsler

Abstract

To cite this article: Calderón MA, Larenas D, Kleine-Tebbe J, Jacobsen L, Passalacqua G, Eng PA, Varga EM, Valovirta E, Moreno C, Malling HJ, Alvarez-Cuesta E, Durham S, Demoly P. European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology task force report on ‘dose–response relationship in allergen-specific immunotherapy’. Allergy 2011; 66: 1345–1359.

Background: For a century, allergen-specific immunotherapy (SIT) has proven to be an effective treatment for allergic rhinitis, asthma, and insect sting allergy. However, as allergen doses are frequently adapted to the individual patient, there are few data on dose-response relationship in SIT. Allergen products for SIT are being increasingly required to conform to regulatory requirements for human medicines, which include the need to demonstrate dose-dependent effects.

Methods: This report, produced by a Task Force of the EAACI Immunotherapy Interest Group, evaluates the currently available data on dose-response relationships in SIT and aims to provide recommendations for the design of future studies.

Results: Fifteen dose-ranging studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and twelve reported a dose-response relationship for clinical efficacy. Several studies also reported a dose-response relationship for immunological and safety endpoints. Due to the use of different reference materials and methodologies for the determination of allergen content, variations in study design, and choice of endpoints, no comparisons could be made between studies and, as a consequence, no general dosing recommendations can be made.

Conclusion: Despite recently introduced guidelines on the standardization of allergen preparations and study design, the Task Force identified a need for universally accepted standards for the measurement of allergen content in SIT preparations, dosing protocols, and selection of clinical endpoints to enable dose-response effects to be compared across studies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.