Volume 17, Issue 4 pp. 534-544

Decision influences and aftermath: parents, stillbirth and autopsy

Dell Horey PhD

Dell Horey PhD

Research Fellow, Research Education and Development Unit, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Vic.

Member, Australian and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance (ANZSA), Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Vicki Flenady PhD

Vicki Flenady PhD

Associate Professor, Mater Medical Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Qld

Member, Australian and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance (ANZSA), Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Liz Conway

Liz Conway

State Coordinator, SANDS Queensland, Brisbane, Qld

Search for more papers by this author
Emma McLeod BPharm(Hons)

Emma McLeod BPharm(Hons)

Founder and Director, Stillbirth Foundation Australia, Sydney, NSW

Search for more papers by this author
Teck Yee Khong MD

Teck Yee Khong MD

Consultant, SA Pathology at Women’s and Children’s Hospital, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA

Member, Australian and New Zealand Stillbirth Alliance (ANZSA), Woolloongabba, Qld, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 June 2012
Citations: 35
Dell Horey
Research Education and Development Unit
La Trobe University
Bundoora, Vic. 3086
Australia
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background Stillbirth, among the most distressing experiences an adult may face, is also a time when parents must decide whether an autopsy or other post-mortem examinations will be performed on their infant. Autopsies can reveal information that might help explain stillbirth, yet little is known about how people make this difficult decision.

Objectives This study examines the influences on decisions about autopsy after stillbirth among Australian parents.

Design The study involved secondary analysis of transcripts of three focus groups using qualitative content analysis.

Participants and setting Seventeen parents of 14 stillborn babies participated in consultations around the revision of a perinatal mortality audit guideline.

Results Parents shared the decision making. Four decision drivers were identified: parents’ preparedness or readiness to make decisions; parental responsibility; concern for possible consequences of an autopsy and the role of health professionals. Each decision driver involved reasons both for and against autopsy. Two decision aftermath were also present: some parents who agreed to an autopsy were dissatisfied with the way the autopsy results were given to them and some parents who did not have an autopsy for their infant expressed some form of regret or uncertainty about the choice they made.

Conclusions To make decisions about autopsy after stillbirth, parents need factual information about autopsy procedures, recognition that there might be fear of blame, an environment of trust, and health services and professionals prepared and skilled for difficult conversations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.