Citizens’ participation in the Italian health-care system: the experience of the Mixed Advisory Committees
Mauro Serapioni PhD
Senior Researchers, Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorNancy Duxbury PhD
Senior Researchers, Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorMauro Serapioni PhD
Senior Researchers, Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorNancy Duxbury PhD
Senior Researchers, Centre for Social Studies, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Background In 1994, the region of Emilia-Romagna recognized the importance of citizens’ participation in the regional health-care system and recommended the institution of Mixed Advisory Committees in the health districts and hospitals with the objective of monitoring and assessing health-care quality from the users’ perspective.
Design This paper reports findings from a qualitatively based evaluation involving direct observations of the committees and 39 semi-structured interviews: 20 with representatives of patients and users’ associations and 19 with health professionals and managers involved in the activities of the committees.
Results The Mixed Advisory Committees introduced for the first time in the Italian health system an ongoing deliberative approach that gave patients and users’ representatives the opportunity to be involved in health service governance. The committees enabled the creation of a method of collective participation that overcame the reductive individualistic ‘approach’ to health-care participation. MAC participants evaluated the committees positively for their mixed composition, which integrated different cultures, experiences and professional profiles with the potential to contribute to solving health-care problems, in a consultative role. Although patients and users’ representatives were able to exert some form of influence, their expectations were greater than the results obtained. The study illuminated some weak points of public consultation, such as a decline in participation by citizen representatives and a weak influence on decision making.
Discussion and conclusions MACs developed a mechanism of participation that provides health-care users’ representatives with the opportunity to contribute to the identification and analysis of critical points of the health-care system. A strength of the MACs is their level of institutionalization within the health system in the region of Emilia-Romagna. However, they contain a problem of representativeness, lacking a formal system of determining a representative composition from among patients and users’ associations. The case study also illustrates that participation without the cooperation of the health service, and financial and organizational support, will result in a decline in citizen participation, given the resources required of these volunteer citizens in return for limited results.
References
- 1 F Focardi , F Gori , R Raspini ( eds ) I gruppi di auto aiuto in Italia. Indagine conoscitiva , Pontedera : CESVOT , 2006 .
- 2CroftS , BeresfordP . The politics of participation . Critical Social Policy , 1992 ; 12 : 20 – 44 .
10.1177/026101839201203502 Google Scholar
- 3ContandriopoulosD . La participation publique: definitions, defies et usages . Santé, Societé e Solidarieté , 2009 ; 2 : 27 – 32 .
10.3406/oss.2009.1350 Google Scholar
- 4ScutchfieldFD , HallL , IresonCL . The public and public health organizations: issues for community engagement in public health . Health Policy , 2006 ; 77 : 76 – 85 .
- 5LitvaA , CanvinK , ShepherdM , JacobyA , GabbayM . Lay perceptions of the desired role and type of user involvement in clinical governance . Health Expectations , 2009 ; 12 : 81 – 91 .
- 6CallaghanGD , WistowG . Publics, patients, citizens, consumers? Power and decision making in primary health carePublic Administration , 2006 ; 3 : 583 – 601 .
10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00603.x Google Scholar
- 7CalnanM . Citizens’ views on health care . Journal of Management in Medicine , 1995 ; 9 : 17 – 23 .
- 8BarnesM , SkelcherC , BeirensH , DalzielR , JeffaresS , WilsonL . Designing Citizen-centered Governance . Birmingham : Joseph Rowntree Foundation , 2008 .
- 9BovenkampHM , TrappenburgMJ , GritKJ . Patient participation in collective healthcare decision making: the Dutch model . Health Expectations , 2009 ; 13 : 73 – 85 .
- 10FrankishCJ , KwanB , RatnerPA , Wharf HigginsJ , LarsenC . Challenges of citizen participation in regional health authorities . Social Science & Medicine , 2002 ; 54 : 1471 – 1480 .
- 11CharlesC , DeMaioS . Lay participation in health care decision making: a conceptual framework . Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law , 1993 ; 18 : 881 – 904 .
- 12TritterJQ , McCallumA . The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein . Health Policy , 2006 ; 76 : 156 – 158 .
- 13CooperL , CooteA , DaviesA , JacksonC . Voices Off: Tackling the Democratic Deficit in Health . London : Institute for Public Policy Research , 1995 .
- 14ZakusD , LysackC . Revisiting community participation . Health Policy and Planning , 1998 ; 13 : 1 – 12 .
- 15ContandriopoulosD . A sociological perspective on public participation in health care . Social Science & Medicine , 2004 ; 58 : 321 – 330 .
- 16CoulterA . Paternalism or partnership?British Medical Journal , 1999 ; 319 : 719 – 720 .
- 17DaykinN , SanidasM , TritterJ , RimmerJ , EvansS . Developing user involvement in a UK cancer network: professionals’ and users’ perspectives . Critical Public Health , 2004 ; 14 : 277 – 294 .
10.1080/09581590400004402 Google Scholar
- 18MartinG . Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management . Social Science & Medicine , 2008 ; 67 : 1757 – 1765 .
- 19HarrisonS , MortM . Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in health care as a technology of legitimation . Social Policy & Administration , 1998 ; 32 : 60 – 70 .
- 20ElsterJ . Deliberative Democracy . Cambridge : Cambridge University Press , 1998 .
10.1017/CBO9781139175005 Google Scholar
- 21FishkinJS . The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy . New Haven : Yale University Press , 1995 .
- 22ChambersS . Deliberative democratic theory . Annual Review of Political Science , 2003 ; 6 : 307 – 323 .
- 23HabermasJ . Further reflections on the public sphere . In : C Calhoun . ( ed .) Habermas and the Public Sphere . Cambridge/London : MIT Press , 1992 .
- 24AbelsonJ , ForestPG , EylesJ , SmithP , MartinE , GauvinFP . Deliberations about deliberative methods: issues in the design and evaluation of public participation process . Social Science and Medicine , 2003 ; 57 : 239 – 251 .
- 25Delli CarpiniMX , CookFM , JacobsLR . Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature . Annual Review of Political Science , 2004 ; 7 : 314 – 344 .
- 26MittonC , SmithN , PeacockS , EvoyB , AbelsonJ . Public participation in health care priority setting: a scoping review . Health Policy , 2009 ; 91 : 219 – 228 .
- 27LehouxP , DaudelinG , Demers-PayetteO , BoivinA . Fostering deliberations about health innovation: what do we want to know from publics?Social Science & Medicine , 2009 ; 68 : 2002 – 2009 .
- 28SangB . Sustaining ordinary wisdom . In : S Davies , S Elisabeth , B Hanley , B New , B Sang ( eds ) Ordinary Wisdom: Reflections on an Experience in Citizenship and Health . London : King’s Fund , 1998 : 74 – 94 .
- 29Guberman-HillR , HorwoodJ , CalnanM . Citizen’s juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome . Health Expectations , 2008 ; 11 : 272 – 281 .
- 30MaxwellJ , RosellS , ForestPJ . Giving citizens a voice in healthcare policy in Canada . British Medical Journal , 2003 ; 326 : 1031 – 1033 .
- 31TaylorSI , BogdanR . Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: The Search for Meaning . New York : Wiley and Sons , 1984 .
- 32RobsonC . Real World Research: A Resource for Social Scientists and Practitioner-researchers . Oxford : Blackwell , 1993 .
- 33HammerslayM , AtkinsonP . Ethnography: Principles in Practice . New York : Routledge , 1995 .
- 34PattonMQ . Qualitative Evaluation and Research Methods . Newbury Park : Sage , 1990 .
- 35HanauC , GatteiL . I Comitati consultivi misti nell’azienda sanitaria Città di Bologna . L’Arco di Giano , 1998 ; 16 : 175 – 187 .
- 36 Ministero della Sanità . Ruolo, azioni e obiettivi del volontariato in sanità. Rapporto finale della Consulta Nazionale Volontariato in Sanità . Rome : Ministero della Sanità , 2000 .
- 37MartinG . ‘Ordinary people only’: knowledge, representativeness, and the publics of public participation in healthcare . Sociology of Health & Illness , 2008 ; 30 : 35 – 54 .
- 38CoulterA . Involving patients: representation or representativeness . Health Expectations , 2002 ; 5 : 1 – 1 .
- 39ArdigòA . La partecipazione nel servizio sanitario nazionale . La ricerca sociale , 1979 ; 20 : 70 – 44 .
- 40ThurstonWE , MackeanG , VollmanA et al. Public participation in regional health policy: a theoretical framework . Health Policy , 2005 ; 73 : 237 – 252 .
- 41EntwistleVA . Editorial. Public involvement in health service governance and development: questions of potential for influence . Health Expectations , 2009 ; 12 : 1 – 3 .
- 42McIverS . Healthy Debate? An Independent Evaluation of Citizens’ Juries in Health Setting . London : King’s Fund , 1998 .
- 43RiggeM . Does public opinion matter? Yes/No//Don’t Know . Health Service Journal , 1995 ; (7 September ); 105 : 26 – 27 .
- 44LomasJ . Devolving authority for health care in Canada’s provinces: 4. Emerging issues and prospects . Canadian Medical Association , 1997 ; 156 : 817 – 823 .
- 45MilewaT , ValentineJ , CalnanM . Managerialism and active citizenship in Britain’s reformed health service: power and community in an era of decentralization . Social Science & Medicine , 1998 ; 47 : 507 – 517 .
- 46PickardS . Citizenship and consumerism in health care: a critic of citizens’ juries . Social Policy and Administration , 1998 ; 32 : 226 – 244 .
- 47LuptonC , PeckhamS , TaylorP . Managing Public Involvement in Healthcare Purchasing . Buckingham : Open University Press , 1998 .
- 48SerapioniM , RomaníO . Potencialidades e desafios da participação em instâncias colegiadas dos sistemas de saúde: os casos de Itália, Inglaterra e Brasil . Cadernos de Saúde Pública , 2006 ; 22 : 2411 – 2421 .
- 49AltieriL . Valutazione e partecipazione. Metodologie per una ricerca interattiva e negoziale . Milan : Angeli Editore , 2009 .
- 50Warf HigginsJ . Closer to home: the case for experiential participation in health reform . Canadian Journal of Public Health , 1999 ; 90 : 30 – 34 .
- 51 WHO-UNICEF . Report of the International Conference on Primary Health Care . Geneva : World Health Organization , 1978 .
- 52RhodesP , NoconA . User involvement and the NHS reforms . Health Expectations , 1998 ; 1 : 73 – 81 .
- 53SummersA , McKeownK . Local voices: evolving a realistic strategy on public consultation . Public Health , 1996 ; 110 : 145 – 150 .