Clustering of fecundability within women
Corresponding Author
Alexander C. McLain
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Dr Alexander C. McLain, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Branch, 6100 Executive Blvd, Rm. 7B05K, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRajeshwari Sundaram
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Search for more papers by this authorMaureen A. Cooney
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Search for more papers by this authorAudra L. Gollenberg
Department of Public Health, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorGermaine M. Buck Louis
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Alexander C. McLain
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Dr Alexander C. McLain, Biostatistics & Bioinformatics Branch, 6100 Executive Blvd, Rm. 7B05K, Rockville, MD 20852, USA. E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorRajeshwari Sundaram
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Search for more papers by this authorMaureen A. Cooney
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Search for more papers by this authorAudra L. Gollenberg
Department of Public Health, Shenandoah University, Winchester, VA, USA
Search for more papers by this authorGermaine M. Buck Louis
Division of Epidemiology, Statistics and Prevention Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Rockville, MD
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
McLain AC, Sundaram R, Cooney MA, Gollenberg AL, Buck Louis GM. Clustering of fecundability within women. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2011; 25: 460–465.
Adverse pregnancy outcomes have long been observed to cluster within women resulting in the inclusion of past reproductive history in clinical assessments and perinatal scoring systems. However, limited study has focused on the clustering of fecundability as measured by time to pregnancy (TTP), despite growing evidence suggestive of a possible association with adverse pregnancy outcomes known to cluster within women. We sought to empirically evaluate the clustering of conception delay, and TTP more globally, in one of the few existing prospective pregnancy cohort studies that captured women's successive pregnancies. The study cohort comprised 544 women who contributed 1119 pregnancies in the US Collaborative Perinatal Project. We used a discrete Cox frailty model to estimate the degree and significance of within-woman clustering of TTP. Women with an initial conception delay (TTP > 6 months) were older, less educated and had higher body mass indices than women not experiencing delays (TTP ≤ 6 months). Our analysis indicates that there is significant within-woman clustering of TTP (variance of the frailty = 0.80, [95% confidence interval 0.49, 1.11]) after adjusting for baseline maternal age, body mass index and education level. Similar to many other reproductive and perinatal outcomes, our findings suggest that TTP clusters within women. Identifying exposures or behaviours that affect TTP may offer strategies for reducing conception delay in future pregnancy attempts.
References
- 1 Bakketeig LS, Hoffman HJ, Harley EE. The tendency to repeat gestational age and birth weight in successive births. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1979; 135: 1086–1103.
- 2 Christensen K, Schmidt MM, Vaeth M, Olsen J. Absence of an environmental effect on the recurrence of facial-cleft defects. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 333: 161–164.
- 3 Jin K, Ho HN, Speed TP, Gill TJ III. Reproductive failure and the major histocompatibility complex. American Journal of Human Genetics 1995; 56: 1456–1467.
- 4 Knudsen UB, Hansen V, Juul S, Secher NJ. Prognosis of a new pregnancy following previous spontaneous abortions. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 1991; 39: 31–36.
- 5 Li DK, Spiers PS. The effect of parity on the relation between maternal history of spontaneous pregnancy loss and the risk of sudden infant death syndrome in offspring. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 48–54.
- 6 Lie RT, Wilcox AJ, Skjaerven R. A population-based study of the risk of recurrence of birth defects. New England Journal of Medicine 1994; 331: 1–4.
- 7 Skjaerven R, Wilcox AJ, Russell D. Birthweight and perinatal mortality of second births conditional on weight of the first. International Journal of Epidemiology 1988; 17: 830–838.
- 8 Wang X, Zuckerman B, Coffman GA, Corwin MJ. Familial aggregation of low birth weight among whites and blacks in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine 1995; 333: 1744–1749.
- 9 Herman AA, Irwig LM, Groeneveld HT. Evaluating obstetric risk scores by receiver operating characteristic curves. American Journal of Epidemiology 1988; 127: 831–842.
- 10 Ananth CV. Second international symposium on successive pregnancy outcomes: a decade of progress. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2007; 21 (Suppl. 1): 1–3.
- 11 Hutcheon JA, Platt RW. The impact of past pregnancy experience on subsequent perinatal outcomes. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2008; 22: 400–408.
- 12 Henriksen TB, Baird DD, Olsen J, Hedegaard M, Secher NJ, Wilcox AJ. Time to pregnancy and preterm delivery. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1997; 89: 594–599.
- 13 Jaques AM, Amor DJ, Gordon Baker HW, Healy DL, Ukoumunne OC, Breheny S, et al. Adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women conceiving without assisted reproductive technologies. Fertility and Sterility 2010; 94: 2674–2679.
- 14 Joffe M, Li Z. Association of time to pregnancy and the outcome of pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility 1994; 62: 71–75.
- 15 Olsen J, Rachootin P, Schiodt AV. Alcohol use, conception time, and birth weight. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 1983; 37: 63–65.
- 16 Williams MA, Goldman MB, Mittendorf R, Monson RR. Subfertility and the risk of low birth weight. Fertility and Sterility 1991; 56: 668–671.
- 17 Shevell T, Malone FD, Vidaver J, Porter F, Luthy DA, Comstock CH, et al. for the FASTER Research Consortium. Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy outcome. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2005; 106: 1039–1045.
- 18 Buck GM, Schisterman EF, Dukic VM, Schieve LA. Research Hurdles Complicating the Analysis of Infertility Treatment on Child Health. Human Reproduction 2005; 20: 12–18.
- 19 Basso O, Olsen J, Bisanti L, Bolumar F, Kuppers-Chinnow M. Repeating episodes of low fecundability. A multicentre European study. The European Study Group on Infertility and Subfecundity. Human Reproduction 1997; 12: 1448–1453.
- 20 Louis GB, Dukic V, Heagerty PJ, Louis TA, Lynch CD, Ryan LM, et al. 2006. Analysis of repeated pregnancy outcomes. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2006; 15: 103–126.
- 21 Niswander KR, Gordon M. The Women and Their Pregnancies. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders, 1979.
- 22 Buck Louis GM, Dmochowski J, Lynch C, Kostyniak P, McGuinness BM, Vena JE. Polychlorinated biphenyl serum concentrations, lifestyle and time-to-pregnancy. Human Reproduction 2009; 24: 451–458.
- 23 Gnoth C, Godehardt D, Godehardt E, Frank-Herrmann P, Freundl G. Time to pregnancy: results of the German prospective study and impact on the management of infertility. Human Reproduction 2003; 18: 1959–1966.
- 24 Wang X, Chen C, Wang L, Chen D, Guang W, French J. Conception, early pregnancy loss, and time to clinical pregnancy: a population-based prospective study. Fertility and Sterility 2003; 79: 577–584.
- 25
Kalbfleisch JD,
Prentice RL.
The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data, 2nd
edn.
New York: Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics, 2002.
10.1002/9781118032985 Google Scholar
- 26 R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, 2010.
- 27 Stanford JB, Hobbs R, Jameson P, deWitt MJ, Fischer RC. Defining dimensions of pregnancy intendedness. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2011; 4: 183–189.
- 28 Klerman LV. The intendedness of pregnancy: a concept in transition. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2011; 4: 155–162.
- 29 Jensen TK, Joffe M, Scheike T, Skytthe A, Gaist D, Petersen I, et al. Early exposure to smoking and future fecundity among Danish twins. International Journal of Andrology 2006; 29: 603–613.
- 30 Kost K, Landry DJ, Darroch JE. Predicting maternal behaviors during pregnancy: does intention status matter? Family Planning Perspectives 1998; 30: 79–88.
- 31 Joffe M, Villard L, Li Z, Plowman R, Vessey M. Long-term recall of time-to-pregnancy. Fertility and Sterility 1993; 60: 99–104.
- 32 Cooney MA, Buck Louis GM, Sundaram R, McGuiness BM, Lynch CD. Validity of self-reported time to pregnancy. Epidemiology 2009; 20: 56–59.
- 33 Zielhuis GA, Hulscher ME, Florack EI. Validity and reliability of a questionnaire on fecundability. International Journal of Epidemiology 1992; 21: 1151–1156.
- 34 Joffe M. Time to pregnancy: a measure of reproductive function in either sex. Asclepios Project. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 1997; 54: 289–295.
- 35 Olsen J, Bonde JP, Hjollund NH, Basso O, Ernst E. Using infertile patients in epidemiologic studies on subfecundity and embryonal loss. Human Reproduction Update 2005; 11: 607–611.
- 36 Slama R, Ducot B, Carstensen L, Lorente C, Rochebrochard E, Leridon H, et al. Feasibility of the current-duration approach to studying human fecundity. Epidemiology 2006; 17: 440–449.
- 37 Small CM, Manatunga AK, Klein M, Feigelson HS, Dominguez CE, McChesney R, et al. Menstrual cycle characteristics: associations with fertility and spontaneous abortion. Epidemiology 2006; 17: 52–60.