Volume 25, Issue 5 pp. 425-435

Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network: design, methods and recruitment experience

Corette B. Parker

Corresponding Author

Corette B. Parker

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC

Dr Corette B. Parker, RTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194, USA. E-mail: [email protected]. Search for more papers by this author
Carol J. R. Hogue

Carol J. R. Hogue

Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, GA

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew A. Koch

Matthew A. Koch

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC

Search for more papers by this author
Marian Willinger

Marian Willinger

Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Search for more papers by this author
Uma M. Reddy

Uma M. Reddy

Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

Search for more papers by this author
Vanessa R. Thorsten

Vanessa R. Thorsten

RTI International, Research Triangle Park, NC

Search for more papers by this author
Donald J. Dudley

Donald J. Dudley

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Robert M. Silver

Robert M. Silver

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Search for more papers by this author
Donald Coustan

Donald Coustan

Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI

Search for more papers by this author
George R. Saade

George R. Saade

University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah Conway

Deborah Conway

University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas

Search for more papers by this author
Michael W. Varner

Michael W. Varner

University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT

Search for more papers by this author
Barbara Stoll

Barbara Stoll

Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

Search for more papers by this author
Halit Pinar

Halit Pinar

Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI

Search for more papers by this author
Radek Bukowski

Radek Bukowski

University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX

Search for more papers by this author
Marshall Carpenter

Marshall Carpenter

Brown University School of Medicine, Providence, RI

Search for more papers by this author
Robert Goldenberg

Robert Goldenberg

Drexel University School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
for the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network

for the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2011
Citations: 66

Summary

Parker CB, Hogue CJR, Koch MA, Willinger M, Reddy UM, Thorsten VR, Dudley DJ, Silver RM, Coustan D, Saade GR, Conway D, Varner MW, Stoll B, Pinar H, Bukowski R, Carpenter M, Goldenberg R for the Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network. Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network: design, methods and recruitment experience. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 2011; 25: 425–435.

The Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network (SCRN) has conducted a multisite, population-based, case–control study, with prospective enrolment of stillbirths and livebirths at the time of delivery. This paper describes the general design, methods and recruitment experience. The SCRN attempted to enrol all stillbirths and a representative sample of livebirths occurring to residents of pre-defined geographical catchment areas delivering at 59 hospitals associated with five clinical sites. Livebirths <32 weeks gestation and women of African descent were oversampled. The recruitment hospitals were chosen to ensure access to at least 90% of all stillbirths and livebirths to residents of the catchment areas. Participants underwent a standardised protocol including maternal interview, medical record abstraction, placental pathology, biospecimen testing and, in stillbirths, post-mortem examination. Recruitment began in March 2006 and was completed in September 2008 with 663 women with a stillbirth and 1932 women with a livebirth enrolled, representing 69% and 63%, respectively, of the women identified. Additional surveillance for stillbirths continued until June 2009 and a follow-up of the case–control study participants was completed in December 2009.

Among consenting women, there were high consent rates for the various study components. For the women with stillbirths, 95% agreed to a maternal interview, chart abstraction and a placental pathological examination; 91% of the women with a livebirth agreed to all of these components. Additionally, 84% of the women with stillbirths agreed to a fetal post-mortem examination. This comprehensive study is poised to systematically study a wide range of potential causes of, and risk factors for, stillbirths and to better understand the scope and incidence of the problem.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.