The phylogenetic structure of primate communities: variation within and across continents
Corresponding Author
Jason M. Kamilar
Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Jason M. Kamilar, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorLisa M. Guidi
Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Jason M. Kamilar
Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
Jason M. Kamilar, Department of Anthropology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorLisa M. Guidi
Department of Anthropology, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Aim Our goals are: (1) to examine the relative degree of phylogenetic overdispersion or clustering of species in communities relative to the entire species pool, (2) to test for across-continent differences in community phylogenetic structure, and (3) to examine the relationship between species richness and community phylogenetic structure.
Location Africa, Madagascar, Asia, and the Neotropics.
Methods We collected species composition and phylogenetic data for over 100 primate communities. For each community, we calculated two measures of phylogenetic structure: (1) the net relatedness index (NRI), which provides a measure of the mean pairwise phylogenetic distance among all species in the community; and (2) the nearest taxon index (NTI), which measures the relative phylogenetic distance among the closest related species in a community. Both measures are relative to the phylogeny of the species in the entire species pool. The phylocom package uses a randomization procedure to test whether the NRI and NTI values are higher or lower than expected by chance alone. In addition, we used a Kruskal–Wallis test to examine differences in NRI and NTI across continents, and linear regressions to examine the relationship between species richness and NRI/NTI.
Results We found that the majority of individual primate communities in Africa, Asia and the Neotropics consist of member species that are neither more nor less closely related than expected by chance alone. Yet 37% of Malagasy communities contain species that are more distantly related to each other compared with random species assemblages. Also, we found that the average degree of relatedness among species in communities differed significantly across continents, with African and Malagasy communities consisting of more distantly related taxa compared with communities in Asia and the Neotropics. Finally, we found a significant negative relationship between species richness and phylogenetic distance among species in African, Asian and Malagasy communities. The average relatedness among species in communities decreased as community size increased.
Main conclusions The majority of individual primate communities exhibit a phylogenetic structure no different from random. Yet there are across-continent differences in the phylogenetic structure of primate communities that probably result from the unique ecological and evolutionary characteristics exhibited by the endemic species found on each continent. In particular, the recent extinctions of numerous primates on Madagascar are likely responsible for the low levels of evolutionary relatedness among species in Malagasy communities.
Supporting Information
Appendix S1 phylocom analyses using the splitter taxonomy and continental species pool dataset.
Appendix S2 phylocom analyses using the splitter taxonomy and regional species pool dataset.
Appendix S3 phylocom analyses using the lumper taxonomy and continental species pool dataset.
Appendix S4 phylocom analyses using the lumper taxonomy and regional species pool dataset.
Appendix S5 The effect of taxonomy and species pool size for quantifying the phylogenetic structure of communities.
Appendix S6 The relationship between species richness and the phylogenetic structure of primate communities.
As a service to our authors and readers, this journal provides supporting information supplied by the authors. Such materials are peer-reviewed and may be re-organized for online delivery, but are not copy-edited or typeset. Technical support issues arising from supporting information (other than missing files) should be addressed to the authors.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
JBI_2267_sm_AppendixS1-S6.doc767 KB | Supporting info item |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Atmar, W. & Patterson, B.D. (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologica, 96, 373–382.
- Bininda-Emonds, O.R.P., Cardillo, M., Jones, K.E., MacPhee, R.D.E., Beck, R.M.D., Grenyer, R., Price, S.A., Vos, R.A., Gittleman, J.L. & Purvis, A. (2007) The delayed rise of present-day mammals. Nature, 446, 507–512.
- Blomberg, S.P., Garland, T., Jr & Ives, A.R. (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution, 57, 717–745.
- Brown, J.H. (1995) Macroecology. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Brown, W.L. & Wilson, E.O. (1956) Character displacement. Systematic Zoology, 5, 49–64.
- Buzzard, P.J. (2006) Ecological partitioning of Cercopithecus campbelli, Cercopithecus petaurista, and Cercopithecus diana in the Tai forest. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 529–558.
- Cardillo, M., Gittleman, J.L. & Purvis, A. (2008) Global patterns in the phylogenetic structure of island mammal assemblages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 1549–1556.
- Cavender-Bares, J., Ackerly, D.D., Baum, D.A. & Bazzaz, F.A. (2004) Phylogenetic overdispersion in Floridian oak communities. The American Naturalist, 163, 823–843.
- Cavender-Bares, J., Keen, A. & Miles, B. (2006) Phylogenetic structure of Floridian plant communities depends on taxonomic and spatial scale. Ecology Letters, 87, S109–S122.
-
Chapman, C.A.,
Gautier-Hion, A.,
Oates, J.F. &
Onderdonk, D.A. (1999) African primate communities: determinants of structure and threats to survival.
Primate communities (ed. by
J.G. Fleagle,
C. Janson and
K.E. Reed), pp. 1–37. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511542381.002 Google Scholar
- Connor, E. & Simberloff, D. (1979) The assembly of species communities: chance or competition? Ecology, 60, 1132–1140.
- Cooper, N., Rodriguez, J. & Purvis, A. (2008) A common tendency for phylogenetic overdispersion in mammalian assemblages. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 275, 2031–2037.
- Darwin, C. (1859) The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Random House (reprint 1993), New York.
- Diamond, J.M. (1975) Assembly of species communities. Ecology and evolution of communities (ed. by M.L. Cody and J.M. Diamond), pp. 342–444. Belknap Press, Cambridge.
- Fleagle, J.G. (1999) Primate adaptation and evolution, 2nd edn. Academic Press, San Diego.
- Fleagle, J.G. & Reed, K.E. (1996) Comparing primate communities: a multivariate approach. Journal of Human Evolution, 30, 489–510.
-
Fleagle, J.G. &
Reed, K.E. (1999) Phylogenetic and temporal perspectives on primate ecology.
Primate communities (ed. by
J.G. Fleagle,
C. Janson and
K.E. Reed), pp. 92–115. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511542381.007 Google Scholar
-
Fleagle, J.G. &
Reed, K.E. (2004) The evolution of primate ecology: patterns of geography and phylogeny.
Shaping primate evolution: form, function and behavior (ed. by
F. Anapol,
R.Z. German and
N.G. Jablonski), pp. 353–367. Cambridge University Press, New York.
10.1017/CBO9780511542336.022 Google Scholar
- Ganzhorn, J.U. (1997) Test of Fox’s assembly rule for functional groups in lemur communities in Madagascar. Journal of Zoology (London), 241, 533–542.
- Ganzhorn, J.U. (1998) Nested patterns of species composition and their implications for lemur biogeography in Madagascar. Folia Primatologica, 69, 332–341.
-
Ganzhorn, J.U. (1999) Body mass, competition and the structure of primate communities.
Primate communities (ed. by
J.G. Fleagle,
C. Janson and
K.E. Reed), pp. 141–157. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511542381.009 Google Scholar
-
Gause, G.F. (1934) The struggle for existence. Williams and Watkins, Baltimore, MD.
10.5962/bhl.title.4489 Google Scholar
- Gautier-Hion, A., Quris, R. & Gautier, J.-P. (1983) Monospecific vs polyspecific life: a comparative study of foraging and antipredatory tactics in a community of Cercopithecus monkeys. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 12, 325–335.
- Godfrey, L.R., Jungers, W.L., Reed, K.E., Simons, E.L. & Chatrath, P.S. (1997) Subfossil lemurs. Natural change and human impact in Madagascar (ed. by S.M. Goodman and B.D. Patterson), pp. 218–256. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC.
- Gotelli, N.J. & McCabe, D.J. (2002) Species co-occurrence: a meta-analysis of J. M. Diamond’s assembly rules model. Ecology Letters, 83, 2091–2096.
- Gotelli, N.J., Buckley, N.J. & Wiens, J.A. (1997) Co-occurrence of Australian land birds: Diamond’s assembly rules revisited. Oikos, 80, 311–324.
- Grandcolas, P. (1998) Phylogenetic analysis and the study of community structure. Oikos, 82, 397–400.
-
Harvey, P.H. &
Pagel, M.D. (1991) The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.1093/oso/9780198546412.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Heymann, E.W. & Buchanan-Smith, H.M. (2000) The behavioural ecology of mixed-species troops of callitrichine primates. Biological Reviews, 75, 169–190.
- Horner-Devine, M.C. & Bohannan, B.J.M. (2006) Phylogenetic clustering and overdispersion in bacterial communities. Ecology Letters, 87, S100–S108.
- Hubbell, S.P. (2001) The unified neutral theory of biodiversity and biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
-
Jablonski, N.G. (1993) Theropithecus: the rise and fall of a primate genus. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511565540 Google Scholar
- Kamilar, J.M. (2009) Environmental and geographic correlates of the taxonomic structure of primate communities. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 139, 382–393.
- Kamilar, J.M., Lehman, S.L. & Muldoon, K.M. (2008) Niche diversity and evolution of Malagasy primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135(S46), 128.
- Kamilar, J.M., Martin, S.K. & Tosi, A.J. (2009) Combining biogeographic and phylogenetic data to examine primate speciation: an example using cercopithecin monkeys. Biotropica, 41, 514–519.
- Kay, R.F., Madden, R.H., Van Schaik, C. & Higdon, D. (1997) Primate species richness is determined by plant productivity: implications for conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94, 13023–13027.
- Knouft, J.H., Losos, J.B., Glor, R.E. & Kolbe, J.J. (2006) Phylogenetic analysis of the evolution of the niche in lizards of the Anolis sagrei group. Ecology Letters, 87, S29–S38.
- Kraft, N.J.B., Cornwell, W.K., Webb, C.O. & Ackerly, D.D. (2007) Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. The American Naturalist, 170, 271–283.
- Lack, D. (1947) Darwin’s finches. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
-
Lehman, S.M. &
Fleagle, J.G. (2006) Biogeography and primates: a review.
Primate biogeography (ed. by
S.M. Lehman and
J.G. Fleagle), pp. 1–58. Springer Publications, New York.
10.1007/0-387-31710-4_1 Google Scholar
- Lehman, S.M., Sussman, R.W., Phillips-Conroy, J. & Prince, W. (2006) Ecological biogeography of primates in Guyana. Primate biogeography (ed. by S.M. Lehman and J.G. Fleagle), pp. 105–130. Springer Publications, New York.
- Lomolino, M.V., Riddle, B.R. & Brown, J.H. (2006) Biogeography, 3rd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
- Lord, J., Westoby, M. & Leishman, M. (1995) Seed size and phylogeny in six temperate floras: constraints, niche conservatism, and adaptation. The American Naturalist, 146, 349–364.
- Losos, J.B. (1996) Phylogenetic perspectives on community ecology. Ecology, 77, 1344–1354.
- Losos, J.B. (2008) Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecology Letters, 11, 995–1007.
- Lotka, A.J. (1925) Elements of physical biology. Williams and Watkins, Baltimore, MD.
- Maddison, W.P. & Maddison, D.R. (2007) M esquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Available at http://mesquiteproject.org (accessed 3/2/2009).
- McGill, B.J., Enquist, B.J., Weiher, E. & Westoby, M. (2006) Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 21, 178–485.
- Mittermeier, R.A., Konstant, W.R., Hawkins, F., Louis, E.E., Langrand, O., Ratsimbazafy, J., Rasoloarison, R., Ganzhorn, J.U., Rajaobelina, S., Tattersall, I. & Meyers, D.M. (2006) Lemurs of Madagascar, 2nd edn. Conservation International, Washington, DC.
- Ossi, K.M. & Kamilar, J.M. (2006) Environmental and phylogenetic correlates of Eulemur behavior and ecology (Primates: Lemuridae). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 61, 53–64.
- Porter, L.M. (2001) Dietary differences among sympatric Callitrichinae in northern Bolivia: Callimico goeldii, Saguinus fuscicollis and S. labiatus. International Journal of Primatology, 22, 961–992.
-
Quinn, G. &
Keough, M. (2002) Experimental design and data analysis for biologists. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
10.1017/CBO9780511806384 Google Scholar
- Reed, K. & Fleagle, J.G. (1995) Geographic and climatic control of primate diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 92, 7874–7876.
- Reed, K.E. & Bidner, L.R. (2004) Primate communities: past, present, and possible future. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 47, 2–39.
-
Rylands, A.B. &
Mittermeier, R.A. (2009) The diversity of the New World primates (Platyrrhini): an annotated taxonomy.
South American primates, developments in primatology: progress and prospects (ed. by
P.A. Garber,
A. Estrada,
J.C. Bicca-Marques,
E.W. Heymann and
K.B. Strier), pp. 23–54. Springer, New York.
10.1007/978-0-387-78705-3_2 Google Scholar
- Scheffer, M. & van Nes, E.H. (2006) Self-organized similarity, the evolutionary emergence of groups of similar species. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 103, 6230–6235.
- Simberloff, D.S. (1970) Taxonomic diversity of island biotas. Evolution, 24, 23–47.
-
Takai, M.,
Anaya, F.,
Shigehara, N. &
Setoguchi, T. (2000) New fossil materials of the earliest New World monkey, Branisella boliviana, and the problem of platyrrhine origins.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 111, 263–281.
10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(200002)111:2<263::AID-AJPA10>3.0.CO;2-6 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- Tokeshi, M. (1991) Faunal assembly in chironomids (Diptera): generic association and spread. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 44, 353–367.
- Volterra, V. (1926) Variations and fluctuations in the number of individuals of animal species living together. McGraw-Hill, New York.
- Webb, C.O. (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. The American Naturalist, 156, 145–155.
- Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D., McPeek, M.A. & Donoghue, M.J. (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 33, 475–505.
- Webb, C.O., Ackerly, D.D. & Kembel, S.W. (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics, 24, 2098–2100.
- Wiens, J.J. & Graham, C.H. (2005) Niche conservatism: integrating evolution, ecology, and conservation biology. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36, 519–539.