Volume 16, Issue 3 pp. 420-424

The optimal mode of delivery for the haemophilia carrier expecting an affected infant is caesarean delivery

A. H. JAMES

A. H. JAMES

Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC

Search for more papers by this author
K. HOOTS

K. HOOTS

Director, Division of Blood Diseases and Resources, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 April 2010
Citations: 58
Andra H. James, MD, Box 3967 DUMC, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
Tel.: +1 919 668 0011; fax: +1 919 681 7861;
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary. While a majority of affected infants of haemophilia carriers who deliver vaginally do not suffer a head bleed, the outcome of labour cannot be predicted. A planned vaginal delivery puts a woman at risk of an abnormal labour and operative vaginal delivery, both of which predispose to intracranial haemorrhage. Furthermore, vaginal delivery does not eliminate the risk to the haemophilia carrier herself. Overall, maternal morbidity and mortality from planned vaginal delivery are not significantly different from those from planned caesarean delivery. Caesarean delivery is recommended or elected now in conditions other than haemophilia carriage, where the potential benefits are not nearly as great. Additionally, vaginal delivery of the haemophilia carrier poses medical/legal risks if the infant is born with cephalohaematoma or intracranial haemorrhage. Caesarean delivery allows for a planned, controlled delivery. Caesarean delivery reduces the risk of intracranial haemorrhage by an estimated 85% and the risk can be nearly eliminated by performing elective caesarean delivery before labour. Therefore, after a discussion of the maternal and foetal risks with planned vaginal delivery versus planned caesarean delivery, haemophilia carriers should be offered the option of an elective caesarean delivery.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.