Volume 16, Issue 1 pp. 66-71

Postmarketing surveillance study of KOGENATE® Bayer with Bio-Set® in patients with haemophilia A: evaluation of patients’ satisfaction after switch to the new reconstitution system

N. VIDOVIC

N. VIDOVIC

Institut fuer Experimentelle Haematologie und Transfusionsmedizin, Universitaet Bonn, Bonn, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
R. MUSSO

R. MUSSO

Azienda Ospedaliera Universita, Modulo Dipartimentale di Emofi, Catania, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
R. KLAMROTH

R. KLAMROTH

Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Haemophiliezentrum, Berlin, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
M. M. ENRIQUEZ

M. M. ENRIQUEZ

Bayer Schering Pharma, Wuppertal, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
K. ACHILLES

K. ACHILLES

Bayer Vital GmbH, Leverkusen, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 December 2009
Citations: 17
Karin Achilles, MD, Bayer Vital GmbH, Bayer Schering Pharma, Building K56, 51368 Leverkusen, Germany.
Tel.: +49 214 305 1018; fax: +49 214 305 1597;
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Summary. KOGENATE® Bayer (rFVIII-FS) with Bio-Set® is designed to prevent patient contact with exposed needles during recombinant factor VIII reconstitution. This postmarketing surveillance study evaluated patient satisfaction before and after switching to the new Bio-Set reconstitution method. Male children and adults with haemophilia A were enrolled from nine European countries. A preference questionnaire was administered to patients after Bio-Set training and at the end of the observation period (≥20 exposure days or 3 months). Physician assessments of patient compliance and satisfaction were conducted at the end of the observation period. Patients (N = 306) received a mean ± SD of 28 ± 23 infusions of rFVIII-FS with Bio-Set. A majority of patients (82%) preferred the Bio-Set method, with domain scores for ease of use, safety from needlesticks, and speed of reconstitution being highest after training and at the end of the observation period. The Bio-Set method received higher mean scores than previous reconstitution methods for worry/safety and ease/confidence domains at both time points. Physician-reported patient compliance with the Bio-Set method was similar or greater compared with the previous method for 94% of the patients, with physicians reporting that 92% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with Bio-Set. Thirteen adverse events (AEs) occurred in nine patients, and five serious AEs occurred in five patients; none was related to rFVIII-FS. No de novo or recurrent inhibitor development was observed during the observation period. rFVIII-FS with Bio-Set was well tolerated and well accepted by haemophilia A patients, which may improve treatment compliance.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.