Volume 41, Issue 10 pp. 1121-1128
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Metastatic pheochromocytoma: Does the size and age matter?

Tomáš Zelinka

Tomáš Zelinka

3rd Department of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Search for more papers by this author
Zdeněk Musil

Zdeněk Musil

Institute of Biology and Medical Genetics

Search for more papers by this author
Jaroslava Dušková

Jaroslava Dušková

Institute of Pathology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University in Prague and General University Hospital in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Search for more papers by this author
Deborah Burton

Deborah Burton

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Warren Grant Magnuson Clinical Center

Search for more papers by this author
Maria J. Merino

Maria J. Merino

Surgical Pathology Section, Laboratory of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Dragana Milosevic

Dragana Milosevic

Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Search for more papers by this author
Jiří Widimský Jr

Jiří Widimský Jr

3rd Department of Medicine, Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Search for more papers by this author
Karel Pacak

Karel Pacak

Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology Program, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 April 2011
Citations: 46
Karel Pacak, Section on Medical Neuroendocrinology, Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology Program, NICHD, NIH, Building 10, CRC, 1-East, Room 1-3140, 10 Center Drive, MSC-1109, Bethesda, MD 20892-1109, USA. Tel.: 1 301 402 4594; fax: 1 301 402 0884; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Eur J Clin Invest 2011; 41 (10): 1121–1128

Background Pheochromocytomas are tumours arising from chromaffin tissue located in the adrenal medulla associated with typical symptoms and signs which may occasionally develop metastases, which are defined as the presence of tumour cells at sites where these cells are not found. This retrospective analysis was focused on clinical, genetic and histopathologic characteristics of primary metastatic versus primary benign pheochromocytomas.

Materials and methods We identified 41 subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma and 108 subjects with apparently benign pheochromocytoma. We assessed dimension and biochemical profile of the primary tumour, age at presentation and time to develop metastases.

Results Subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma presented at a significantly younger age (41·4 ± 14·7 vs. 50·2 ± 13·7 years; P < 0·001) with larger primary tumours (8·38 ± 3·27 vs. 6·18 ± 2·75 cm; P < 0·001) and secreted more frequently norepinephrine (95·1% vs. 83·3%; P = 0·046) compared to subjects with apparently benign pheochromocytomas. No significant differences were found in the incidence of genetic mutations in both groups of subjects (25·7% in the metastatic group and 14·7% in the benign group; P = 0·13). From available histopathologic markers of potential malignancy, only necrosis occurred more frequently in subjects with metastatic pheochromocytoma (27·6% vs. 0%; P < 0·001). The median time to develop metastases was 3·6 years with the longest interval 24 years.

Conclusions In conclusion, regardless of a genetic background, the size of a primary pheochromocytoma and age of its first presentation are two independent risk factors associated with the development of metastatic disease.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.