Volume 154, Issue 5 pp. 564-568
research paper

GIMEMA AIDA 0493 amended protocol for elderly patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia. Long-term results and prognostic factors

Roberto Latagliata

Roberto Latagliata

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Università‘La Sapienza’, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
Massimo Breccia

Massimo Breccia

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Università‘La Sapienza’, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
Paola Fazi

Paola Fazi

Centro Calcolo – GIMEMA

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Vignetti

Marco Vignetti

Centro Calcolo – GIMEMA

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Di Raimondo

Francesco Di Raimondo

Ematologia, Università di Catania

Search for more papers by this author
Marco Sborgia

Marco Sborgia

Pescara – U.O. Ematologia Clinica

Search for more papers by this author
Donatella Vincelli

Donatella Vincelli

Ematologia, Ospedale Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli, Reggio Calabria

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Candoni

Anna Candoni

Ematologia, Università di Udine

Search for more papers by this author
Flavia Salvi

Flavia Salvi

Ematologia, Ospedale SS Antonio e Biagio, Alessandria

Search for more papers by this author
Serena Rupoli

Serena Rupoli

Ematologia, Università delle Marche, Ancona

Search for more papers by this author
Giovanni Martinelli

Giovanni Martinelli

Ematologia, Università di Bologna

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Grazia Kropp

Maria Grazia Kropp

Ematologia, Ospedale A Pugliese, Catanzaro

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Tonso

Anna Tonso

Ematologia, Ospedale degli Infermi, Biella

Search for more papers by this author
Adriano Venditti

Adriano Venditti

Ematologia, Università Tor Vergata, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
Lorella Melillo

Lorella Melillo

Ematologia, Ospedale Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, San Giovanni Rotondo

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Cimino

Giuseppe Cimino

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Università‘La Sapienza’, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Concetta Petti

Maria Concetta Petti

Ematologia, Istituto Regina Elena, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Avvisati

Giuseppe Avvisati

Ematologia, Università Campus Biomedico, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
Francesco Lo-Coco

Francesco Lo-Coco

Dipartimento di Biopatologia, Università Tor Vergata, Roma

Laboratorio di Neuro-Oncoematologia, Fondazione Santa Lucia, Roma, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Franco Mandelli

Franco Mandelli

Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Università‘La Sapienza’, Roma

Search for more papers by this author
for the GIMEMA Acute Leukaemia Working Party

for the GIMEMA Acute Leukaemia Working Party

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 14 July 2011
Citations: 20
Roberto Latagliata, MD, Dipartimento di Biotecnologie Cellulari ed Ematologia, Università‘La Sapienza’, Via Benevento 6 – 00161 Rome, Italy. E-mail: [email protected]

Summary

To reduce toxicity in elderly patients with acute promyelocytic leukaemia, in 1997 the Gruppo Italiano Malattie Ematologiche Dell’Adulto (GIMEMA) started an amended protocol for patients aged >60 years, with the same induction [all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) + idarubicin] as in younger patients, followed by a single consolidation course (idarubicin + cytarabine) and maintenance with intermittent ATRA. Among 60 enrolled patients, 54 (90%) achieved haematological remission and six died during induction. Four additional patients died in complete remission (CR) from haemorrhage (2) and infection (2) prior or during consolidation therapy. Eleven patients relapsed at a median time of 17·5 months from CR. The 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) rates were 76·1%, 64·6% and 27·4%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified a performance score (PS) = 2 as the only significant adverse prognostic factor for both OS (P = 0·017) and DFS (P = 0·0003). Male sex had an unfavourable impact on DFS (P = 0·021) and on CIR (P = 0·019), but not on OS (P = 0·234). In multivariate analysis for DFS, only PS = 2 retained prognostic significance (HR = 4·5, P = 0·0083). In conclusion, the amended GIMEMA protocol is effective, with similar relapse rate and inferior toxicity compared to the original AIDA 0493. However, considering the recent availability of effective new agents, a less aggressive approach should be tested in this setting.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.